Back in "boot" we lined up by the hundreds and got shots till our arms bled.  I don't recall being asked to volunteer or choose which shot I was going to get.  They did have the keys to the brig, I didn't.

On 7/23/21 1:08 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:
She was imprisoned multiple times.  She lost her liberty, certainly much more of a heavy hand than being required to get vaccinated.  The government has a duty of care as part of being the soverign.  They must act to protect the public.  My grandfather was a cop whose duty included forcibly removing contagious people to that “pest house” for quarantine.  I think a vaccine requirement is what the government should do to protect the greatest portion of the population.  Anyone here been in the military and take a pass on the shots?

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 23, 2021, at 1:59 PM, David Coudron <david.coud...@advantenon.com> wrote:



Unfortunately I don’t know the particulars of typhoid Mary’s situation.   I understand a bit of the folk lore, but don’t only have an idea of what that story is about.   My basic understanding was that an individual who knew they were sick was intentionally infecting others.   Certainly a despicable act if that was the case.   To better put that in the context of today’s situation I would want to know these things:

 1. Was there  typhoid vaccine that was generally available?
 2. What is the mortality rate of typhoid fever versus covid?   I
    suspect typhoid was significantly higher, but don’t have any data
    to back that up.
 3. I believe there is case law to suggest intentionally infecting
    people is a pretty serious crime and after the initial stupid
    college intentional infection parties, we don’t really have
    people intentionally trying to infect others.

If we extend that argument to other diseases, will we now require flu vaccine?   It has always been a “good idea”, especially for those in high risk health or age groups.   But it has never been required. We don’t even require vaccine for measles, shingles, and a myriad of other annoying and/or dangerous diseases.   And these have FDA approved vaccines.

However, I would reiterate this:

If the vaccine works, and I have been vaccinated, why do I care if others haven’t?   Am I worried the vaccine doesn’t work?   Do I think it is necessary to force people to take an experimental drug for their own good will against their will?

Regards,

*From:* Chuck McCown <ch...@go-mtc.com>
*Sent:* Friday, July 23, 2021 2:43 PM
*To:* David Coudron <david.coud...@advantenon.com>
*Cc:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political

One question:  Should Typhoid Mary have been allowed to just roam free?

Sent from my iPhone



    On Jul 23, 2021, at 1:37 PM, David Coudron
    <david.coud...@advantenon.com
    <mailto:david.coud...@advantenon.com>> wrote:

    

    Here is what I find particularly challenging about suggesting
    that folks who have chosen not to take the vaccine are not that
    smart.

     1. Folks who do that never talk about that fact that this is not
        an FDA approved medicine/vaccine.   I took the Moderna
        vaccine, the paperwork clearly stated several facts.  Among
        them are:

         1. This is not FDA approved.
         2. This “vaccine” has not been proven to prevent the
            virus.   While we likely all agree that there is a very
            good likelihood that this “vaccine” will help prevent it,
            it is far from a proven fact.

     2. The argument is, “there should be no reason to think this
        vaccine isn’t safe since people aren’t dying from taking the
        vaccine”.    Vaccines are a risk/reward type of medical
        treatment.   Every medicine you take has some level of side
        effect. The vast majority of medicines have such negligible
        side effects, that they are considered completely safe.   The
        FDA approval process exists to ensure we understand the
        potential of serious side effects and drug interaction
        issues.   If you are 30 years old and folks are saying you
        have to take this experimental drug to prevent this
        incredibly small chance of you becoming seriously ill or
        dying, it seems like an intelligent thing to say “I am not
        sure the risk of getting seriously ill or dying from this
        disease outweighs the risk of using an experimental drug”.  
        It used to be that people relied upon a conversation with
        their doctor to determine personal risk of disease and use of
        a drug.    Apparently we no longer do that.   We publicly
        shame people into using experimental drugs.
     3. Since it is not FDA approved, we don’t have a full
        understanding of drug interactions with other medicines folks
        need to take.   We likely understand the very common
        medicines, but, certainly not all. We have FDA approval
        processes for good reason.   If for example, you were under
        40 and were taking seizure control medication, it would be
        very fair to hold off on an experimental drug until it is
        fully understood if the vaccine might lessen the
        effectiveness of the seizure control medication. An
        incredibly low risk of serious illness or death from the
        virus could turn into a good chance of serious injury from
        seizure.   As far as I know data like that is certainly not
        available yet.
     4. Why do vaccinated people feel the need to belittle those that
        have decided not to get vaccinated by an experimental
        drug?    Does it make them feel smarter?   We have people not
        getting flu vaccinations every year, and that is with FDA
        approved medicine.   But now all of a sudden it is OK to
        ridicule folks that are making a decision based limited data
        on an experimental drug for which the majority of the
        population has a very low chance of serious illness or
        death?   And when they do ridicule folks, they never discuss
        the facts at hand, or want to have a serious discussion about
        the risk/reward of this particular vaccine.   Two years from
        now, with an FDA approval in place and a full understanding
        of drug interactions and effectiveness of the vaccine the
        conversation might look completely different.   Right now, I
        believe some very intelligent people are looking at the
        risk/reward and saying “not now, but probably some day as
        this will become the new yearly flu vaccine”.   Until then,
        my risk of virus related illness doesn’t warrant a decision
        to take the vaccine.
     5. Why are people that are vaccinated so obsessed with people
        that aren’t vaccinated?   For those of us that are
        vaccinated, we are safe right?   That was the point of taking
        the vaccine.
     6. Most of the science that seems most accurate right now points
        to this being with us permanently like an influenza sort of
        virus.   It will show up every year with little mutations
        that will require updates, or boosters, or yearly covid
        shots.    What ever you want to call them.     Is really so
        stupid to wait until this is FDA approved before
        participating?   If we have to do this without FDA approval,
        why does that process even exist?

    I have always appreciated this list because it is usually very
    fact focused, and very good at exploring solutions to problems.  
    While some lists are very superficial and suffer from pat answers
    to technical problems, folks in this list have always tended dig
    deep and find tangible information related to the email topic.  
    I get that it is very easy to joke about the intelligence of
    those who have made a decision we don’t agree with, but I don’t
    believe this topic is nearly that cut and dried.

    As Chuck mentioned, unfortunately this is a somewhat political
    topic.   I don’t understand why, other than the fact that some
    react more harshly to being told they have to do something.  
    This should be a scientific discussion. If definitely shouldn’t
    be about public shame.   We don’t know the medical situation of
    those that chose not to participate in an experimental medical
    treatment.

    Regards,

    *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com
    <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown via AF
    *Sent:* Friday, July 23, 2021 1:02 PM
    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com
    <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
    *Cc:* Chuck McCown <ch...@go-mtc.com <mailto:ch...@go-mtc.com>>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political

    They could sponsor concerts and barbecues that only admit
    unvaccinated...

    How can I get that fake news to be picked up by the junk news feeds?

    *From:*Forrest Christian (List Account)

    *Sent:*Friday, July 23, 2021 11:55 AM

    *To:*AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group

    *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political

    I've wondered if it might be a good thing for the liberal side to
    start saying "take the vaccine or not, we don't care - in fact we
    would prefer that you don't so there are less of you to vote next
    go around".

    On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:26 AM Carl Peterson
    <cpeter...@portnetworks.com <mailto:cpeter...@portnetworks.com>>
    wrote:

        That assumes IQ==Comon sense.  Lots of smart people can be
        really dumb when it comes to sports, religon, and politics.  
        It seems a subset**of people have convinced themselves that
        vaccines, and specifically the covid vaccines, are somehow a
        liberal thing.

        On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:28 AM Chuck McCown via AF
        <af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>> wrote:

            If the covid variants kill only unvaccinated, then global
            IQ average will increase, right?  Always good when your
            team wins.

-- AF mailing list
            AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
            <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>

-- AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
        <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>

--
    - Forrest

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
    <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to