I don't understand what advantage using 200B larger frames are for ISP
access-side customers, considering you're going to have to mss clamp
them down to 1500 for internet.

Using 9000B frames in the datacenter is one thing due to the greatly
decreased (~30% last I checked) CPU load on endpoints, but in ASIC
based routers and switches it doesn't matter really.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:30 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
> One advantage of the 450 is that we can move >1700 byte ethernet frames.
>
> On 6/20/2016 12:24 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>
>> It's a continuously evolving standard with a well defined short a
>> medium term upgrade path. Multi carrier aggregation, diverse uplink
>> and downlink paths on different towers to a CPE, etc. Lots of cool
>> stuff.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Kurt Fankhauser
>>
>> <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> 90mbps in a 20mhz Channel? That's what Cambium 450 could get 2 years ago
>>> on
>>> a whole lot more solid software/firmware.
>>>
>>> So whats the advantages of the LTE? Is it going to be cheaper than the
>>> Cambium 450? Is the license keys for SM throughput or can 1 SM do the
>>> full
>>> speed?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Craig Schmaderer
>>> <cr...@skywaveconnect.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have it.  They are letting me talk about it pass my nda.  Hardware so
>>>> far is solid.   Software is very beta. Missing many key features needed
>>>> for
>>>> comerical deployment.  We are seeing about 90mb on 20mhz which is what
>>>> is to
>>>> be expected with R9 LTE.   I posted maybe a week ago on one of our
>>>> links.
>>>> 5ghz is on the road map.  Shoot me your questions.
>>>>
>>>> Craig Schmaderer
>>>> Cell 402-380-1245
>>>> Skywave Wireless, Inc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:52 PM -0500, "Colin Stanners"
>>>> <cstann...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Like are you thinking against each other, or fighting Matt and Sriram
>>>> from
>>>> Cambium in one corner and Telrad ex-Mossad snipers in another?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:17 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I havent heard much from them lately, do you think rick and Patrick
>>>>> ended
>>>>> up in a knife fight?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Josh Luthman
>>>>> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ban all Baicells 5 GHz.  Leave it to the cheap gear!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Kurt Fankhauser
>>>>>> <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do they have any frequencies out there besides 3.65ghz? Are 5ghz
>>>>>>> trials
>>>>>>> going on right now?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman
>>>>>>> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does anyone besides the guys in Amarillo have this gear deployed?
>>>>>>>> Care to comment on/off list?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>>> team
>>>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to