Carrying a payload of 1500 bytes + headers means that your transport will have to be able to do more than 1500 regardless.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 12:38:34 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells - who's deployed it? I see no reason you couldn't just bridge a vlan into a VPLS tunnel on the access router. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: Transport VPLS + QinQ? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP From: "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 12:36:07 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells - who's deployed it? I don't understand what advantage using 200B larger frames are for ISP access-side customers, considering you're going to have to mss clamp them down to 1500 for internet. Using 9000B frames in the datacenter is one thing due to the greatly decreased (~30% last I checked) CPU load on endpoints, but in ASIC based routers and switches it doesn't matter really. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:30 PM, George Skorup < geo...@cbcast.com > wrote: > One advantage of the 450 is that we can move >1700 byte ethernet frames. > > On 6/20/2016 12:24 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >> >> It's a continuously evolving standard with a well defined short a >> medium term upgrade path. Multi carrier aggregation, diverse uplink >> and downlink paths on different towers to a CPE, etc. Lots of cool >> stuff. >> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Kurt Fankhauser >> >> < lists.wavel...@gmail.com > wrote: >>> >>> 90mbps in a 20mhz Channel? That's what Cambium 450 could get 2 years ago >>> on >>> a whole lot more solid software/firmware. >>> >>> So whats the advantages of the LTE? Is it going to be cheaper than the >>> Cambium 450? Is the license keys for SM throughput or can 1 SM do the >>> full >>> speed? >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Craig Schmaderer >>> < cr...@skywaveconnect.com > >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I have it. They are letting me talk about it pass my nda. Hardware so >>>> far is solid. Software is very beta. Missing many key features needed >>>> for >>>> comerical deployment. We are seeing about 90mb on 20mhz which is what >>>> is to >>>> be expected with R9 LTE. I posted maybe a week ago on one of our >>>> links. >>>> 5ghz is on the road map. Shoot me your questions. >>>> >>>> Craig Schmaderer >>>> Cell 402-380-1245 >>>> Skywave Wireless, Inc. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:52 PM -0500, "Colin Stanners" >>>> < cstann...@gmail.com > wrote: >>>> >>>> Like are you thinking against each other, or fighting Matt and Sriram >>>> from >>>> Cambium in one corner and Telrad ex-Mossad snipers in another? >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:17 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm >>>> < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I havent heard much from them lately, do you think rick and Patrick >>>>> ended >>>>> up in a knife fight? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Josh Luthman >>>>> < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Ban all Baicells 5 GHz. Leave it to the cheap gear!!! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Kurt Fankhauser >>>>>> < lists.wavel...@gmail.com > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do they have any frequencies out there besides 3.65ghz? Are 5ghz >>>>>>> trials >>>>>>> going on right now? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman >>>>>>> < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does anyone besides the guys in Amarillo have this gear deployed? >>>>>>>> Care to comment on/off list? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team >>>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >