I found Baicells new animated marketing logo https://media.giphy.com/media/3oEjHKpLe4Ax4v8VzO/giphy.gif
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Rick Harnish <rick.harn...@baicells.com> wrote: > Josh, > > > > Here is a short video describing RSRP (Reference Signal Received Power) > calculations in LTE. As most LTE is used in Mobile operations, this > measurement is necessary for cellular handoffs, CINR measurements, etc. > This is comparable to RSSI that most WISPs are used to. > > > > > http://lteuniversity.com/get_trained/video_tutorials/m/videotutorials/11523.aspx > > > > RSRP (Reference Signal Receive Power) is the average power of Resource > Elements (RE) that carry cell specific Reference Signals (RS) over the > entire bandwidth, so RSRP is only measured in the symbols carrying RS. > While RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indicator) is a parameter which > provides information about total received wide-band power (measure in all > symbols) including all interference and thermal noise. > > So it would be safe to write that, in LTE, RSRP provides information about > signal strength and RSSI helps in determining interference and noise > information. This is the reason, RSRQ (Reference Signal Receive Quality) > measurement and calculation is based on both RSRP and RSSI. > > Here is another tutorial about RSSI vs. RSRP > > > http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-308-rssi-vs-rsrp-a-brief-lte-signal-strength-primer/ > > Respectfully, > > > > *Rick Harnish* > > Director of WISP Markets > > Baicells Technologies, N.A. > > Mobile: +1.972.922.1443 > > Email: rick.harn...@baicells.com > > Follow us on Facebook for the latest news > <https://www.facebook.com/BaiCells> > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Monday, June 20, 2016 2:06 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Baicells - who's deployed it? > > > > -80 dBm or -80 in the LTE measurement? I know there are two different > values and they vary greatly, but I'm not sure on the details. > > > > I don't believe the 12 meg would be the entire AP's capacity at that > distance/range/signal, especially with LTE (think 1 bar on your cell phone > not taking out the entire Verizon tower). > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Isnt the NLOS performance a direct trade-off vs throughput though? I > remember when the Telrad guys were showing this link that was miles away > through all these trees connecting in the -80's and they were all excited > that it was still pushing 12mbps to that CPE. But at the expense of it was > consuming 100% of the AP's total resources (airtime) . So basically just > take a 450 AP and run every connected client in 1x or 2x mode and that will > be the same thing as trying to push an LTE system to the limits. Am I wrong? > > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > NLOS > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > 90mbps in a 20mhz Channel? That's what Cambium 450 could get 2 years > ago on a whole lot more solid software/firmware. > > > > So whats the advantages of the LTE? Is it going to be cheaper than the > Cambium 450? Is the license keys for SM throughput or can 1 SM do the full > speed? > > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Craig Schmaderer < > cr...@skywaveconnect.com> wrote: > > I have it. They are letting me talk about it pass my nda. Hardware so > far is solid. Software is very beta. Missing many key features needed for > comerical deployment. We are seeing about 90mb on 20mhz which is what is > to be expected with R9 LTE. I posted maybe a week ago on one of our > links. 5ghz is on the road map. Shoot me your questions. > > Craig Schmaderer > Cell 402-380-1245 > Skywave Wireless, Inc. > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:52 PM -0500, "Colin Stanners" < > cstann...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Like are you thinking against each other, or fighting Matt and Sriram from > Cambium in one corner and Telrad ex-Mossad snipers in another? > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:17 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I havent heard much from them lately, do you think rick and Patrick ended > up in a knife fight? > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > Ban all Baicells 5 GHz. Leave it to the cheap gear!!! > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Do they have any frequencies out there besides 3.65ghz? Are 5ghz trials > going on right now? > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > Does anyone besides the guys in Amarillo have this gear deployed? Care to > comment on/off list? > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
