Is anything released?
From: Jon Bruce
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 8:44 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode
Yes, Sonar. It's looking really good.
On 8/19/2016 10:21 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
WRT PC, wasn’t Simon working on something that possibly could be a competitor?
From: Jon Bruce
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 8:07 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode
We're using PC with DHCP for management of SMs and for public IPs. Each is
on it's own VLAN and IPs are given out by PC based on MAC address.
PC can do RADIUS and has it (sort of half, almost, kinda) built in but I
haven't made it work (yet). Calling support will only leave you curled up in a
ball, crying.
Under Network -> Servers, there is RADIUS and Canopy RADIUS. I asked once
what the difference was, what they were meant to do differently and why there
are two and was met with documentation removed from their site and several
support calls and emails ignored.
I hope that helped a little.
If anyone can share information on RADIUS and PC, I would love it.
On 8/19/2016 1:19 AM, George Skorup wrote:
The only thing is full relay vs insertion only. Full relay probably
wouldn't work in this scenario. Because you can't define the L3 relay IP per
VLAN. The AP is going to relay all DHCP requests to the specified address. I
still say the way to go is static management IP on the SMs.
Wait... am I being stupid again? Is option 82 inserted for the SM itself or
not? Been a while since I messed with it. If it does, that would be a good
feature request for Cambium. Let us turn that off for the SM itself.
On 8/19/2016 12:03 AM, Sean Heskett wrote:
Good call on the VLANs George! I think that might be the ticket.
That gives me something to try in our lab :)
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
Does PC do the zero-touch config? Why can't a new SM come up and get
the option 66 info for the config URL, then download its config which contains
a static management IP?
Or, what about separating things in VLANs? Put your SM management on a
dedicated VLAN with its own DHCP server instance and the various options you
need? Customer/user/data VLAN would be another DHCP server where you'd act upon
the Agent-Remote-ID option 82 info.
On 8/18/2016 11:25 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
right now everything is static (mgmt and public ip) we try to deploy
SMs with NAT enabled but that's not possible half the time for one reason or
another.
Once we move to powercode I want to use their zero touch config (dhcp
option 66) to config the SM and then option 82 if the SM is bridged to give an
ip to their router or our managed calix router. I'd prefer to not have to keep
track of router MACs especially if the router is the customer's and not our
calix.
Powercode doesn't use RADIUS so I'd probably have to set that up on
the side or something.
Like I said I want to make this as automagic as possible and I'm
wondering if anyone has already gone thru this so I don't have to reinvent the
wheel.
Powercode didn't have any ideas of how to accomplish this so maybe
I'm blazing a trail on the cutting edge :-/
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, George Skorup
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','geo...@cbcast.com');> wrote:
I assume you're doing bridge mode? Use RADIUS to assign the SM's
management IP. Then DHCP + Op 82 is used for the customer equipment.
We just do static management IP on the SMs. Playing with NAT + DMZ
on the customer side. Traceroute and other ICMP responses don't work through
NAT mode, even with DMZ. And L2TP tunnels. I forget what else I tested on my SM
at home. So far I'm not too thrilled with it.
On 8/18/2016 10:08 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
Hummmm that's the conclusion we were coming to also.
I'm trying to find a way to make it all automagic but that seems
not possible :-/
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
From how I understand it that is not possible unless you plan
on managing via the public IP.
Option 82, in its simplest form, just allows accounting via the
SU mac address, along with what 'circuit' (AP) it came from. I think in your
situation if you want to use powercode to hand out public addresses you will
need a static management network for CPEs.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us>
wrote:
Thx joe,
So if it sends the same 0a:00:3e MAC for the bridged device,
how do you get the dhcp server to send the management IP to the SM since that
would be the same MAC??
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com>
wrote:
Sean,
No problem!
Cambium 450/EPMP behave the same way I am pretty sure
without looking at my notes. This post describes it perfectly and also has a
raw dump of the dhcp request:
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636
OPTION: 82 ( 29) Relay Agent Information
Circuit-ID 0a:00:3e:XX:XX:XX #AP MAC
Remote-ID 0a:00:3e:YY:YY:YY #SU Wireless MAC
That means that even if the client is in bridge mode the
only mac address you need to track is the subscriber unit. I do not know any
powercode specific stuff but I am looking at implementing with DHCP ISC.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Sean Heskett
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Hey joe,
Yeah we are mocking it up in our lab right now. Mainly
need to know what MAC gets sent for all the different interfaces - management,
NAT enabled, bridged etc.
Powercode will only let you add one IP and MAC per
device. Since we are in the process of importing all our data for the
migration to PC I'd like to set it all up now to be ready for option 82 in the
future ;)
Joe, do you mind if our network engineer Elijah contacts
you off list??
Thanks,
Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak
<jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
I plan on implementing it with cambium both 450/epmp.
Any specific questions? I learned a lot by taking a setting up a dhcp server
with whatever verbose logging turned on and watching the requests.
On Aug 18, 2016 8:13 PM, "Josh Luthman"
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
I'm almost certain someone does... But I'm not 100%
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 18, 2016 8:51 PM, "Sean Heskett"
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Powercode said they had never done it and didn't
know anyone who had. (I was kinda surprised at that response)
Figured I'd check to see if y'all had used it.
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
Have you contacted Powercode about this or no? I
figure they'd know, their wisp is Canopy.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 18, 2016 8:35 PM, "Sean Heskett"
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
We are in the process of migrating to
powercode...it's not an easy task but I think it will be well worth it. Lots
of details to figure out lol.
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Tushar Patel
<tpa...@ecpi.com> wrote:
You moved to powercode!!!
Tushar
> On Aug 18, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Sean Heskett
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>
> Hey gang,
>
> Any experts out there have experience with
DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode? If so can I pick your brain???
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean
>
>
