Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> As I understqnd it, low power devices are usually viewed as having limited
> capabilities.
> Thus, I would normally expect to see their autonomic functions handled
> by a
> proxy, much as a COAP gateway provides connectivity to the rest of the
> Internet for such devices.
> If that is the case, then I would not expect to run GRASP or ANIMA
> bootstrap on the low end devices, but rather on the proxy.
The goal is not to run GRASP or ACP on the low-end devices (the lightbulbs),
but rather to be able to use common infrastructure for bootstrapping.
> What am I missing?
It's not about running GRASP over an ACP between lightbulbs, it's about
enrollment/bootstrap. It might be about running GRASP over an ACP
between lighting controllers, and that may well involve the proxies you
mention.
(It's also worth making a comparison to what we consider "limited
capabilities" to what we had as control plane CPUs 20 years years ago)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
