On 16 Nov 2011 13:35, "Francis Tyers" <fty...@prompsit.com> wrote:
>
> Hey all!
>
> I've thrown all the parts together and have a working prototype of the
> lexical selection module. A rule compiler, and a processor.
>
> At the moment the rule format is like:
>
>
https://apertium.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/apertium/branches/apertium-lex-tools/examples/rules.txt
>
> But we have also discussed an XML-based format, which would be like:
>
>
https://apertium.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/apertium/branches/apertium-lex-tools/examples/rules.xml
>
> I would like to, as my next step, improve the rule compiler (at the
> moment there is a lot of string mangling that I think could be improved
> on -- e.g. for holding the pattern lengths/ids), and support the XML
> format, but in order to do this, I would first like to get comments on
> it. Is there anything that you would change? Do you feel comfortable
> writing rules in this format?
>
It might be better to ask next week, when GCI tasks have been sorted and
finalised. Split focus and so on.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
