El dc 16 de 11 de 2011 a les 14:18 +0000, en/na Jimmy O'Regan va escriure: > On 16 Nov 2011 14:09, "Francis Tyers" <fty...@prompsit.com> wrote: > > > > El dc 16 de 11 de 2011 a les 14:02 +0000, en/na Jimmy O'Regan va > > escriure: > > > On 16 Nov 2011 13:35, "Francis Tyers" <fty...@prompsit.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hey all! > > > > > > > > I've thrown all the parts together and have a working prototype > of > > > the > > > > lexical selection module. A rule compiler, and a processor. > > > > > > > > At the moment the rule format is like: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://apertium.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/apertium/branches/apertium-lex-tools/examples/rules.txt > > > > > > > > But we have also discussed an XML-based format, which would be > like: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://apertium.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/apertium/branches/apertium-lex-tools/examples/rules.xml > > > > > > > > I would like to, as my next step, improve the rule compiler (at > the > > > > moment there is a lot of string mangling that I think could be > > > improved > > > > on -- e.g. for holding the pattern lengths/ids), and support the > XML > > > > format, but in order to do this, I would first like to get > comments > > > on > > > > it. Is there anything that you would change? Do you feel > comfortable > > > > writing rules in this format? > > > > > > > > > > It might be better to ask next week, when GCI tasks have been > sorted > > > and finalised. Split focus and so on. > > > > What a great idea! We could make some GCI tasks like "come up with X > > lexical selection rules for a language pair of your choice". > > > > You'll want to rephrase that, significantly. GCI students are casually > browsing a list of titles so you should pick a title that doesn't rely > on a relatively obscure phrase - something that immediately informs > them that they probably already know this.
Yeah, how about: "find X rules for how to translate words with more than one possible translation" ? > > I was also thinking of a GCI task to make a human interface to > creating > > the rules (maybe web-based?), offering the user all the possible > > sentences, and asking them to mark them as "ok/not ok" and mark the > > "contextually important words". I can't think that it would be more > than > > a couple of days work for someone with experience with PHP. > > Nice idea. There are plenty of javascript draggy droppy things around, > so we could maybe also look for an interface to build basic transfer > rules too. Exactly, also, web 2.0 stuff is hip with the kids! Fran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
