Zhukov Pavel wrote: > > > On 11/7/07, *James Rayner* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > On Wed, November 7, 2007 21:11, Zhukov Pavel wrote: > > > > 1) I know about Arch-Way. > > > > 2) Arch starts to accelerate developing process and growing up > > repositories, however Devs/TUs count aren't growing - this way it > becomes > > more and more unstable. > > Arch can be small but stable instead of big and unusable, since > we have > > limited numbers of Devs. > > Um. The group has skyrocketed in the last year, what are you talking > about. > > > 4) Pacman developers do strange things deaning DB-backends and > continue to > > develop ugly and very slow plaintext DB. > > The db isn't that slow at all. Patches are welcome otherwise. > > > 5) As i write above, arch devs now are growing up arch repos, but > > dependency > > problem still not resolved - e.g. most of resent problems can't > be exists > > in > > rpm distros since it updates will be deny by package manager. > > What do you mean? What dependency problems? Quit with the generics. > > > > Ok, example. I have octave and octaveforge installed. > > if any of curl, gnuplot, coreutils... updated with .sobump it stop to > work, cause it linked with old libs version. > Sometime it updates after several days in repos. So, every time i should > rebuild it manually. > Why? Can't we create the rule "package _should_ be tested and _all_ > packages depends on it _should_ be rebuilded before it going to > core/extra/community." > ? >
Why didn't you post a bugreport for that? _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
