On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 05:30:28PM +0200, thus spake Ignacy Gawedzki: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:59:16AM -0400, thus spake Bob Copeland: > > Note ath5k compared to madwifi does not have automatic noise > > immunity so it is expected to perform somewhat poorly at > > higher rates. > > And what does it take to implement ANI on ath5k, based on the code in madwifi?
Besides, if that's the fault of the lack of ANI in ath5k, then shouldn't we observe much worse performance in infrastructure mode as well (at least in noisy environments)? -- To err is human, to purr feline. _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
