On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 05:37:07PM +0200, Ignacy Gawedzki wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 05:30:28PM +0200, thus spake Ignacy Gawedzki: > > And what does it take to implement ANI on ath5k, based on the code in > > madwifi?
Not a whole lot - a quick way to get it implemented is to just move ath9k's implementation to ath.ko and use it directly. Nick had some pacthes going back at least a year to implement it based on the ANI patent -- it's in the archives, but will need forward porting and fixing. > Besides, if that's the fault of the lack of ANI in ath5k, then shouldn't we > observe much worse performance in infrastructure mode as well (at least in > noisy environments)? Indeed, that suggests another test - do you see the same in infrastructure mode? -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
