jkeny wrote: > No more evidence or less evidence for or against than your speculation.
And my "speculation" is that: julf wrote: > some differences might be extremely small, and require a lot of training > and concentration to pick out. What part of that do you think is speculation, and what part of that do you disagree with? > Huh? This is his statement, not mine! That is why I used double quotes - to show that it was you quoting him. > Do you not accept his ABX results? As pointed out by a number of postings in that thread, there were a fair number of uncontrolled parameters. > What part of his statement do you think is too strong "-They do > establish that when I say, "It sounds better to me", I am reporting a > provable reality, not a placebo effect."?- The words "provable" and "reality". One single, uncontrolled and unverified test does not establish "provable reality". > I think we can conclude that anything but gross, obvious differences > require training & concentration to pick out in an blind test. i have no idea how you arrived at that conclusion/conjecture from the thread you quoted. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
