On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 06:14:23PM +0000, Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev wrote:
Hi Dan,
I don't think nostr would be a suitable replacement for the mailing
list, although this opinion is biased by the fact that I do not use
nostr and find it to be uninteresting.
email-like functionality over nostr isn't really explored yet, but it is
something I'm interesting in. So I agree nostr isn't a suitable email
replacement *yet*.
From my limited understanding of how nostr works, it's not clear to me
how a distributed system that uses message broadcast would work in the
same way as a mailing list.
My idea was to have a mailing list relay, the only thing missing is To:
and Cc: tags on notes so that the relay can reject notes not destined
for the mailing list
How would people "subscribe"? How would archives be searched or
otherwise be available to people who are not on nostr?
You would subscribe by connecting to the relay and pulling down the
notes. your client could cache notes and only pull new ones.
How do you distinguish and filter between legitimate dev posts
intended for discussion and random crap and shitposting as shows up on
social media?
You would need to have metadata on the note that specifies that the note
is destined for that specific mailing list relay (To, Cc, etc). Then the
client sending the message can send it to that specific relay during
note composition. Again, this is different than then current model that
exists with social networking clients designed for blasting your note to
as many people as possible.
I also don't think that long form text on nostr (or any similar
platform) can sufficiently replace email. None of these things seem to
contain a way to have a separate subject line as email does. Subjects
are immensely important for me as it provides a quick and easy way to
filter out things I don't care about reading. I don't want to have read
something in before I can decide that I don't care about reading it.
Subject lines already exist in nostr and are a part of some email-like
clients like https://github.com/unclebob/more-speech . it's just a tag
like every other piece of metadata.
In general, I strongly prefer email, or a platform that has email as a
first class user interface, over platforms such as nostr, matrix, or web
forums. Email is universal - everyone has one and everyone knows how it
works. It dramatically lowers the barrier of entry. Having to make an
account somewhere or download some specific client in order to
participate will simply result in only the most dedicated participating.
Development in open source must be an open process and the barriers to
entry should be low.
I definitely prefer email at the moment as well, but it is also a pain
in the ass to run email infra. As someone who runs both email servers
and nostr relays I can say nostr is much more pleasant.
So yeah, it's a bit too early for a nostr replacement, but it's
definitely possible, and you get proper cryptographic identities and
schnorr signed notes which is a bonus. For dealing with spam you could
have a sat entrance fee via lightning. I will start looking into this!
Cheers,
Will
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
