> Sam wrote: > Meaning the fact that you are so sure > he's guilty is pure partisanship.
I'm sure Rove is guilty for a few specific reasons: 1.) The Whitehouse originally said Rove had nothing to do with it. That turned out not to be true by the Whitehouse's own admission. 2.) #1 proves that either the Whitehouse was covering up Rove's activities or he was covering up his own, even to his own staff. 3.) The order to preserve all documents related this case was given 12 hours after it should have been which gave the Whitehouse 12 hours to destroy documents. 4.) Mr. Fitzgerald was appointed by the Whitehouse to investigate the case and he's had a steady stream of witnesses. 5.) Rove volunteered for further testimony despite the fact that he was warned his testimony could be used against him. *Nobody* does that unless they think they must. Partisan has nothing to do with it. There is clearly smoke here and Rove is clearly trying to make sure it doesn't turn into fire. You don't do that unless you're guilty. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:176796 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
