But then we wind up with NY and California not allowing it and AZ saying do what you want.
Wouldn't the 10th and 15th amendments prohibit that? Or should we just do away with the constitution, and legislate as we see fit? Gruss Gott wrote: >> Adam wrote: >> I have always thought that the intention of the Second Amendment was >> three-fold: to establish that the states needed their own militia, that the >> citizens were that militia, and that *both* the states' militia and the >> individuals making up those militia had the right to keep and bear arms, >> both jointly and severally. >> > > I agree with point one, but not the second two - however I also think > what they intended shouldn't matter so much to us except as legal > trivia. I think it's our responsibility to make our own decisions > with that as guidance. > > Just like military regulations and officers. > >> I would eliminate the federal waiver system in favor of one at each state's >> What do you all think of this? >> > > It's a piece of genius - anything to get the power our of the federal > gov't, but I think your solution definitely meets the 80/20 rule > overall. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:257109 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
