You just said you knew it's what the framers intended, so how would it not be legislating around the amendment?
Gruss Gott wrote: >> tBone wrote: >> If we make it ok to legislate around the 2nd, whats to stop them doing >> the same for the 1st, 4th, 5th or any others? >> > > Implicit in your statement is that we would be legislating around it - > and I get that that's your opinion. The problem is that not everyone > agrees with you and so to not upset the apple cart I like Adam's > solution. > > Alternatively we could push for unambiguous definition, which is your > approach. > > My problem with that is: > > (1.) It will open an infinite stream of legal BS. > > (2.) It may involve a temp ban on guns, ammo, and/or usage. > > (3.) It serves no practical purpose since you would have effectively > the right you want. > > But, yeah, it's not perfect - it's only practical. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:257130 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
