> tBone wrote: > If we make it ok to legislate around the 2nd, whats to stop them doing > the same for the 1st, 4th, 5th or any others? >
Implicit in your statement is that we would be legislating around it - and I get that that's your opinion. The problem is that not everyone agrees with you and so to not upset the apple cart I like Adam's solution. Alternatively we could push for unambiguous definition, which is your approach. My problem with that is: (1.) It will open an infinite stream of legal BS. (2.) It may involve a temp ban on guns, ammo, and/or usage. (3.) It serves no practical purpose since you would have effectively the right you want. But, yeah, it's not perfect - it's only practical. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:257129 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
