In other words, you do question the Inspector-general You provide me a credible link for unprosecuted voter fraud and perhaps we can talk.But if you still make up your own facts this way, I am out Tired of trying to talk sense to you. Yeah real fast. On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But in reality no charges were brought because of understaffing. He > was fired for not pursuing the case but they turned it into a > political. The actual cases mentioned were never investigated so you > win. Nice. > > While we're on tangents the New Black Panthers didn't suppress voters > because Holder dropped the case. > > . > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thank you for reminding me why I decided years ago that there was no >> point in talking to you. >> >> The office of the inspector general, as I read it, said that Iglesias >> acted correctly and was fired because the results did not match an >> ideological agenda. Do you dispute the findings in that report? >> >> Please provide the particulars of any unprosecuted and fraudulent >> voter registration in the 2006 election in New Mexico. I submit that >> you cannot. Multiple respected investigative reporters tracked down >> all of the names the GOP was tossing around and verified the >> citizenship of every one of the people in question. The FBI located >> and interviewed the ACORN employee who supposed submitted fraudulent >> registration forms and concluded that he committed minor errors not >> fraud. Not one single instance of an inappropriately cast ballot was >> ever documented, despite multiple exhaustive investigations. >> >> And by the way -- do you *really* think that TEN PERCENT of New Mexico >> voters are illegal aliens? I will tell you *one* problem with that >> statistic, assuming they are still using the same smoke and mirrors as >> in 2006... they are assuming that anyone born in another country is >> an illegal alien. I beg to differ. I am not a US citizen but I am a >> permanent resident and quite entitled to a driver's license, thank >> you. Even if I need a $450 piece of plastic to prove it in >> California. >> >> Another bogus issue from 2006: If the voter registration list shows >> Michael Chavez living at six different locations with different >> birthdays, there must be voter fraud afoot. No matter how common the >> name might be. But this assumes that you think that US citizens named >> Chavez should be able to vote. >> >> Still another: certain addresses had a couple of hundred people >> registered there. I went and found out which ones, just because I know >> how.. They were all social work organizations that receive mail for >> homeless individuals. Homeless individuals are in fact supposed to >> register at the address where they receive their mail. But this >> assumes that you think homeless people should be able to vote. >> >> Shrug. We went through this at the time. >> >> What will happen with this one is that in a couple years the 64,000 >> bogus voters statement will have been demonstrated for the nonsense >> that it is. But in the meantime the law will have passed and even >> fewer people will be casting ballots than today. Which just so happens >> to benefit an unpopular Republican administration in a state where >> electoral margins are often if not generally in the three figures or >> less. >> >> So whatever. You keep telling yourself that stuff. >> > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:339283 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
