http://www.whitehouse.gov/open

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote:

> they do. But the law does away with a bad court decision that meant you
> could not go to court over it, essentially. You had to file within 180 days
> of your pay becoming unequal, or too bad. Nobody can meet that, not that
> anybody wants to go to court anyway or that there aren't plenty of other
> hurdles if you do. But the Lily Ledbetter Act made women a little less
> powerless.
>
> Open.gov used to exist but the republicans killed the funding. Data
> transparency in government. Can't have *that*.
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:14 PM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> What did he do for equal pay?  It's my understanding that women still make
>> only a percentage of what men do?
>>
>> Also what's open.gov?  There is no domain by that name.
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > we don't have to argue. I realize our opinions differ, and probably
>> differ
>> > a lot on health care. That's ok. I just think small government is good,
>> > except where it's ineffective. You probably disagree on the meaning of
>> > "ineffective" for one thing.
>> >
>> > Romney was mentioned as the option to be avoided is all. We've talked
>> about
>> > Gary Johnson -- I personally think he's not a bad option but don't want
>> to
>> > see him do a Ralph Nader. Myself.
>> >
>> > On the rest, well. Hopefully equal pay is not something we disagree on,
>> or
>> > we might have to argue about that one at some point ;)
>> >
>> > I was against Detroit, but some good did come of it. I'm a pragmatist,
>> > fundamentally, shrug, but we may well interpret our facts differently
>> too.
>> > But you asked for something Obama did that was good -- let's go with
>> equal
>> > pay for women. That works for me ;)
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:50 PM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > I'm not sure what Romney had to do with the question, as I've never
>> come
>> > > out in support of the guy.
>> > >
>> > > As to the rest, well, let's just saw we don't agree, cause I'm not in
>> the
>> > > mood to argue tonight.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > He signed the Lily Ledbetter Act on his first day in office as I
>> > recall.
>> > > >
>> > > > open.gov was a start. Like a number of his other issues, not
>> enough. I
>> > > > count health care reform as positive, personally. Though not enough
>> and
>> > > not
>> > > > done properly. Sotomayor (sp?) was a good appointment. The stimulus
>> > was a
>> > > > good idea until it was compromised out of existence. He did save
>> > Detroit,
>> > > > though I have to say I was against that at the time. I dislike
>> military
>> > > > intervention but Libya was probably a good idea. State Department
>> > > > internet-in-a-suitcase thing was good. Student loan interest was
>> good.
>> > > >
>> > > > The theme here though is that he has tried to compromise with people
>> > who
>> > > > were determined to undermine him.
>> > > >
>> > > > Negatives:
>> > > >
>> > > > Guantanamo
>> > > > Use of drones
>> > > > Wasted lots of money on Wall Street bailouts.
>> > > > SOPA/PIPA
>> > > >
>> > > > Shrug. I put this next to Romney, who is a total tool as far as I
>> can
>> > > > tell.....
>> > > >
>> > > > Republicans have wagged the dog on one bogus issue after another.
>> Why
>> > do
>> > > we
>> > > > have to argue that voting rights are a good idea all over again?
>> Why is
>> > > it
>> > > > a good idea to mandate vaginal probes? Why do people think it's bad
>> > that
>> > > > Planned Parenthood saved my freaking life and maybe it cost the feds
>> > > forty
>> > > > cents or so? (I'd have to go look up how much of their primary care
>> > costs
>> > > > get a federal subsidy? It wasn't much because I did pay about fifty
>> > bucks
>> > > > for the visit but nobody else wanted to deal with it and you know
>> what,
>> > > if
>> > > >  I don't get the prescription I do get blood clots and those will
>> > > > absolutely kill you about mmm twenty to thirty percent of the
>> > time...the
>> > > > exact number is discussable. Point is, Romney is not only a tool,
>> he's
>> > a
>> > > > tool who parrots a platform that endangers my dignity, my health
>> and my
>> > > > life.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:36 PM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I have a hard time identifying anything he's done good, fill me
>> in.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Eric Roberts <
>> > > > > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > There is still a large contingent on the left that is none too
>> > happy
>> > > > with
>> > > > > > Obama and his continuance of the Bush policies....but yes,
>> there is
>> > > > also
>> > > > > a
>> > > > > > good number who think that Obama's shit doesn't stink.  He is
>> > > donesome
>> > > > > > really good stuff...but he has also really screwed the pooch
>> hard.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
>> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 9:43 PM
>> > > > > > To: cf-community
>> > > > > > Subject: Re: Good news from NY today - NDAA
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The funniest thing about the loudest of the party loyalists is
>> that
>> > > > they
>> > > > > > often don't understand their own parties beliefs, and just
>> parrot
>> > > > > whatever
>> > > > > > they are told.  From what I can see these are the ones that
>> either
>> > > > > blindly
>> > > > > > follow the party of their parents, or blindly rebelled by
>> choosing
>> > > the
>> > > > > > other
>> > > > > > party.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The differences I see between parties at this point are pretty
>> > small
>> > > in
>> > > > > my
>> > > > > > mind.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Judah McAuley <
>> > > ju...@wiredotter.com
>> > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Yeah, I've seen "anti-war left now pro-warrior president left"
>> > bit
>> > > > > > > quite a lot. It really bugs me. The same folks who would be
>> > > > demonizing
>> > > > > > > Bush or McCain for taking out Bin Laden and then pushing the
>> fact
>> > > > > > > during an election are trumpeting the same thing being done by
>> > > Obama.
>> > > > > > > On the other hand, you've got all the guys on the right who
>> are
>> > > > trying
>> > > > > > > to shame Obama for pointing out that he made the call to take
>> out
>> > > Bin
>> > > > > > > Laden when Bush was all 9/11 all the time in 2004 and showing
>> up
>> > > in a
>> > > > > > > flight suit on an aircraft carrier under a Mission
>> Accomplished
>> > > > > > > banner.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > So many people are seemingly into it to support "their guy"
>> > instead
>> > > > of
>> > > > > > > trying to support right and wrong and making things better.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Judah
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:04 PM, LRS Scout <
>> lrssc...@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Not a big fan of salon generally, but recently I have
>> noticed
>> > > that
>> > > > > > > > they
>> > > > > > > are
>> > > > > > > > very upfront when dealing with the difference between
>> reporting
>> > > > > > > > facts,
>> > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > offering opinion.  They have even talked about how the
>> formerly
>> > > > > > > > anti-war left has turned into the pro-warrior president
>> left.
>> > >  That
>> > > > > > > > was an interesting stor
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:350772
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to