Disagree Adam... SVN is still the best to use if the development team will never be distributed across many locations, and even if it is but contained with the same company securely, SVN is still the better way to go.
-- Regards, Andrew Scott WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/ Google+: http://plus.google.com/113032480415921517411 On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Adam Cameron < adamcameroncoldfus...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Before you go too far down the SVN route, what you're kinda suggesting is > akin to saying "we've finally decided to upgrade from Windows 3.1, so we're > upgrading to WindowsXP". SVN is great software, but it's not really "where > it's at" any more. > > You really ought to be looking at Git: either your own instance of it > running (and managed by by you), or perhaps better for your situation, > outsourcing the management of it to Github. > > Having a shared dev server is a bit of an old-school approach to things, > you really ought to look at getting the developers developing on their own > machines. > > -- > Adam > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:354124 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
