What Cutter said. :-) On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Steve 'Cutter' Blades < cold.fus...@cutterscrossing.com> wrote:
> > And I'll have to disagree with you, Andrew... > > Having worked extensively in both Subversion and Git, I find Git to be a > much more robust tool, providing a lot more flexibility, and huge gains > in overall workflow. Anytime I have to move back towards Subversion it > is somewhat painful. All of that aside, Git is not for the faint of > heart. It can take a while to wrap your head around task workflows that > are very basic in Subversion. It's a complex tool, for enterprise > development, and very affective. The larger the team, the more valuable > it is. > > Steve 'Cutter' Blades > Adobe Community Professional > Adobe Certified Expert > Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer > ____________ > http://cutterscrossing.com > > > Co-Author "Learning Ext JS 3.2" Packt Publishing 2010 > > https://www.packtpub.com/learning-ext-js-3-2-for-building-dynamic-desktop-style-user-interfaces/book > > "The best way to predict the future is to help create it" > > On 1/30/2013 8:23 AM, Andrew Scott wrote: > > Disagree Adam... > > > > SVN is still the best to use if the development team will never be > > distributed across many locations, and even if it is but contained with > the > > same company securely, SVN is still the better way to go. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:354137 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
