On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Marco Abis <marco.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > First: sorry, my reply was meant to be sent to you only, not the list >> Because it was described as "a talk". That means the bulk of the >> actually meaningful content in it comes from someone's lips flapping. >> That can be rendered as text, easily. If there are slides, ... but >> I've already been over all of that. > > you are wrong,
No, I am *not* wrong. A talk can be translated into text+embeds with very little or nothing being lost, almost by definition. It might be the case that the OP was wrong when he described the video in question as "a talk", but that's a completely different matter. Regardless, I highly doubt that there's anywhere close to 60 minutes of video in there that couldn't be better presented in some other way. Most likely, it would be better as text and a few short video segments, the latter adding up to much less than 60 minutes in duration. > watch the video No. A full hour is way, way too long for something analogous to a blog post or a mailing list message, and I have lots of other demands on my time. (As for gaz's conspiracy theory, I won't even dignify that with a separate response.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
