> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Marco Abis <marco.a...@gmail.com> wrote: >> First: sorry, my reply was meant to be sent to you only, not the list >>> Because it was described as "a talk". That means the bulk of the >>> actually meaningful content in it comes from someone's lips flapping. >>> That can be rendered as text, easily. If there are slides, ... but >>> I've already been over all of that. >> >> you are wrong, > > No, I am *not* wrong. A talk can be translated into text+embeds with > very little or nothing being lost, almost by definition. > > It might be the case that the OP was wrong when he described the video > in question as "a talk", but that's a completely different matter. > > Regardless, I highly doubt that there's anywhere close to 60 minutes > of video in there that couldn't be better presented in some other way. > Most likely, it would be better as text and a few short video > segments, the latter adding up to much less than 60 minutes in > duration. > >> watch the video > > No. A full hour is way, way too long for something analogous to a blog > post or a mailing list message, and I have lots of other demands on my > time.
Hi, My real name is Stuart Halloway, and I have the ability to remove people from this mailing list. People who continue off-topic debates about the merits of video vs. text will be removed. Let's get back to Clojure. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
