I agree - I'd swap my Flex-o-fold for a two-blade fixed and a 129 rating in
less than 12 seconds!  I also race on and against a Frers 33 here (108
rating vs 117 for a 35-3) - they smoke us in light air, we hold our own in
10-15+.

Tim
Mojito
C&C 35-3
Branford, CT

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Hoyt, Mike <mike.h...@impgroup.com> wrote:

> Wow ... So many topics and so many responses
>
> 1. When a vessel changes its keel, rudder or rig it is always treated as
> an attempt to make the boat sail better (faster).  Only if it is looked at
> hard and long and decided is no faster and rarely slower is that changed
>
> 2. 12 sec/mile on 2 blade fixed prop? Every racer here would add a small 2
> blade fixed prop for that.  This is free money.  Normally is 6 sec ...
>
> 3. Spin and non spin in same fleet.  Classic no no that is only allowed
> when not many boats involved to allow fleet separation
>
> 4. Some areas talking having one rating for a model.  The base handicap.
>  No adjustments for bizarre setups. Is weird to have 35 foot boat sailing
> same rating as something like a c&c 27 ...
>
> J30 isva great boat.  Big interior, sails well.  At dyc in nova scotia we
> had a j30 racing against frers 33.  Frers great light wind boat ...
>
> Mike
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CnC-List on behalf of dwight veinot
> Sent: Mon 12/11/2012 18:11
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Keel mods vs Phrf Rating
>
> Hey Ron.it's all about having fun and if you guys are having fun racing
> that way that's great.but what you guys are trying to do with the numbers
> is very complicated and much more complicated than a simple headsail
> adjustment IMHO.  Around here my boat rates 126 with and 144 without
> spinnaker, that is 18 seconds per mile in the difference for a mast head
> rig kite, I believe it is more like 12 seconds per mile for a fractional
> rig.the base rating assumes a jib greater that 110% with no difference
> between 135 and 150, but there is at least one contributor on this list who
> knows more about that than I do so maybe he will chime in.  When we use
> such ratings and had boats with and without spinnaker in the same race I
> can almost guarantee that a spinnaker carrying boat would always win,
> especially on evening races where the wind inevitably dies out for the last
> legs.  On the positive side the boats that do not carry spinnaker will
> always have a reasonable "excuse to lose"
>
>
>
>
>
> Dwight Veinot
>
> C&C 35 MKII, Alianna
>
> Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Ron
> Casciato
> Sent: November 12, 2012 4:52 PM
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Keel mods vs Phrf Rating
>
>
>
> Dwight:
>
>
>
> Ii agree "in principle"; but that thinking applied back when we were all
> 25 years younger.....and could handle BIG spinnakers, etc.  In our fleets
> today..there are no boats that sail in the "D" fleet......the "C" fleet
> starts with the J 30's and goes up to whatever...we do have a JAM fleet
> that includes a Tartan 40 and a Sabre 42....not much fun for anyone else in
> that fleet...
>
>
>
> If we separated them along spinnaker and no spinnaker lines....we'd need
> several classes with only 2-3 boats each in them.....
>
>
>
> The way we handle it on Wednesday nites is to allow either spinnakers or
> not.....those races are somewhere between 3 miles to 6 miles in length...so
> the long legs for either upwind or downwind don't exist......ON the
> weekends, for most except the "big drawing" races.....we don't get enough
> boats to fill most fleets so we do the same fleet splits and allow both
> spinnakers or not.
>
>
>
> None of us want to race in a 2 boat fleet....
>
>
>
> Allowing an additional 10 % to the non-spinnaker boats seems to even up
> the challenge most evenings.......The "hot" boat in my fleet is still an
> old Pearson Flyer who actually did some rig changes to get down into the B
> fleet......he now rates 129 racing.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Ron Casciato
>
> Impromptu
>
> C&C 38MKIIC..'77
>
> Mass Bay
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to