Rick

 

You say "I can still point up to under 30 degrees apparent," 

 

My 35 MKII will sail at 30 degrees to apparent wind but I have found that my
VMG (wind) is highest when I sail at about 33 degrees to apparent.  I don't
have the numbers for all of my headsails because I have only been carrying
my furling 135 since I installed my Raymarine ST60 system which gave me the
ability to display VMG(wind) on the fly.  I would expect that I may get
different results with different sized headsails and different wind and or
sea conditions; like with my racing 150 in say 10-12 apparent and flat seas
VMG (wind) may be best at 30 apparent or below.  

 

By New England PHRF my 35 MKII has a base rating of 120, slightly slower
than your 38MKI (111 by New England numbers) but you race it at 120.

 

My question to you is: do you find pointing at under 30 degrees to apparent
to result in your best VMG to weather under all conditions?  

 

Dwight Veinot

C&C 35 MKII, Alianna

Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS

  _____  

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Rick
Brass
Sent: November 12, 2012 12:39 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Keel mods vs Phrf Rating

 

US Sailing shows the PHRF ratings nationally for the Freres 33 run from 108
to 114, with the national average being 108. PHRF of the Chesapeake has one
boat listed at 114. I looked at NC-PHRF for a comparison (our ratings are
usually 3 seconds lower, since our PHRF group thinks we have higher average
winds than the Chesapeake) but there are no boats listed.

 

Where you sail can make a big difference in  the ratings. I would think the
108 listed in US Sailing would probably be for a windy area like LIS, New
England, or Northern California.

 

I had the keel on my 38 shortened by 10" to 5'3". I took off 800#, and added
a torpedo from Mars Metals that weighed 1150#. The additional weight brings
the boat weight up to 15,000. But I bet it weighs a lot more in cruising
trim. NC-PHRF gave me 3 seconds (from 117 to 120) because of an anticipated
loss in pointing. I don't notice the boat being any stiffer, but the size of
the torpedo was determined based on the weight and depth of keel removed,
with the objective of maintaining the previous stability. I can still point
up to under 30 degrees apparent, so I have not noticed any real loss or gain
from the change.

 

Genoa tracks closer to the rail would logically increase sheeting angles and
limit pointing, though they might open up the leach of the sail on a reach.
I don't think PHRF would adjust a rating based on this.

 

Your local PHRF group will look at the performance of the boat over a period
of time, and can elect to adjust the rating. Most commonly that is done when
a boat owner applies for an increase due to his record, or to a change in
the boat. But it can happen in cases where a competing skipper shows
evidence that the boat is doing a whole bunch better than the rating would
indicate it should. It's called a Performance Handicap after all.

 

 

Rick Brass

Washington, NC

 

 

 

 

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of TARAS
IWANYCKI
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 7:58 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Stus-List Keel mods vs Phrf Rating

 

I have a general question about boat dynamics and related phrf rating

I have been racing against a Frers33 this season, a first-time boat owner
with green crew, that cleaned up and won almost everything in all conditions

Many of us are asking whether is handicap was correct.

The OD rating for the boat is 114 and the owner claimed this for the season

This boat had it's keel depth shortened by 6-8 inches and added a bulb to
equal the lost keel weight.  From what I understand, if you add a bulb to
your keel, it will stiffen the boat's feel....correct? But...

1) What impact would cutting the keel down and adding a bulb to offset the
lost ballast do?  Would she be faster? slower?  Point higher? Lower?

2) This boat also has an additional genoa track closer to the rail.  Should
this affect the handicap?

3) What is the official way of determining the correct handicap? Is there an
official body to address?

 

Thanks

Taras

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5388 - Release Date: 11/11/12

_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to