I agree. Original message follows. On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:52:18PM +0100, Chris Crowther wrote: > On Thursday 12 Jun 2003 9:30 pm, you wrote: > > > channels should be listed with the channel name clearly shown... and either > > display the topic, or show "<PRIVATE CHANNEL>" (or something similiar) in > > it's place. > > Which is pretty much what I said. +p *should* be visible on /list, but > should be hidden on a whois, also channel membership shouldn't be available > via NAMES or WHO. +s channels shoudl just be invisible everywhere. This is > of course my opinion - I'll talk it over with other the coders and make it > this way assuming none of them comes up with a reason not to.
- [Coder-Com] bug in /list Timothy Barbeisch
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Captain Kirk
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Chris Crowther
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Captain Kirk
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Timothy Barbeisch
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Chris Crowther
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Timothy Barbeisch
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Chris Crowther
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /li... The Storm Surfer
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Kev
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Chris Crowther
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Captain Kirk
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /li... Timothy Barbeisch
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /li... Carlo Wood
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /li... Carlo Wood
- Re: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Tom Laermans
- RE: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Tom Rons
- RE: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Timothy Barbeisch
- RE: [Coder-Com] bug in /list Tom Laermans