-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/23/2015 09:57 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: > - It adds burden to developers, needing to support those projects > merged from comm-central. Just look around in mozilla-central at > all the optional things that are not visible on treeherder and > break regularly. The situation wouldn't be different in that sense. > But the people that do care about those projects will have a better > experience supporting them.
I don't believe this would really add a burden; we haven't had thunderbird bustage block landing code in the past, and we're not about to start. One other argument against the merge I can see is machine load: right now we don't run c-c automation in response to changes on our integration branches, but only on the merges to m-c. Perhaps we should keep doing that for now. On the plus side, it could make it easier to share code between thunderbird and the b2g email code. > Considering all the above, are there still objections to this > happening, and can we finally allow Joshua to go ahead with his > merge plan? (CCing bsmedberg, who, iirc, had Brendan's delegation > to have the final word on this) Strongly in favour for all the reasons you mentioned. Thanks Ms2ger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWKftoAAoJEOXgvIL+s8n2ALEH/3quXXrs7lAn1qiWjdj0nfTE r6qbmHHUL1OlfkipeFLy+vjLmI2g5ep/aKlAfYBILowaQgzFlXUiTBiz1+Yz2ChD 1UzCHOGKxcPLNYVpgEu5snBjdWhPk1DJZk5DMt390V2ldU4LVfF0f9FvIsXW6n2G Cov/GS3KPk3rJToi82ZTjpFJdRMdh/WP6ePxDvRRJsgYiRUtdBu0jhA2Pqi0B1x6 /gmK/i0Jaw5UP/1QZd5JUjuWTuDc2Ta8bX/a3AJ/TSXbXYVcVOMrv7U55sRbN6aA qbqNAZ/0LsCNRLqA7+2uzUV4+riX9ISgiruuL8wQJCtTXRT4KuZlmqCzDRJ3Ots= =8jpM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
