i think we should stop the vote and re-visit the original thread at [1]. there we could discuss the name and we could re-visit the option to use the asf incubator directly (for gsoc projects).
regards, gerhard [1] http://markmail.org/message/d7oogfabvliwn7fg 2011/11/2 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>: > thx matt for the links > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2011/11/2 Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>: >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> FWIW: >>> >>> -1 >>> >>> why introducing yet another level of "incubation" process ? >>> I find it (very) problematic trying to be in some sort of >>> "competition" w/ the Apache Incubator... >>> (even if the discussed targets here are JSF specific) >> >> As I have attempted to point out elsewhere via email links (which >> presumably went unfollowed), not only is this "problematic"; per >> Incubator PMC consensus it is downright unacceptable. You simply >> can't have a mini-incubator so complete that it makes sense even to >> use the *name* "incubator". PLEASE read [1] for background, or skip >> directly to [2] (search for "Some possible solutions") to know what IS >> acceptable. There is no need for MyFaces to rehash my experiences on >> Commons' behalf two-plus years ago. >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/n3t7lksceuplh45r >> [2] http://markmail.org/message/r6ffmmyh6pxnn6nd >> >> Matt >> >>> >>> Why not simply "moving" future (MyFaces) GSoC directly to the Apache >>> Labs project ([1])?! >>> For there, just start coding and releasing (alphas etc). The new >>> release process is straightforward >>> and not heavyweight - so (alpha) releases are cheap. >>> >>> -M >>> >>> [1] http://labs.apache.org/ >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Bernd Bohmann >>> <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com> wrote: >>>> Ok, >>>> >>>> if there is no real difference between Apache Incubator and Apache >>>> MyFaces Incubator, >>>> I have to change my vote to >>>> >>>> -1 >>>> >>>> especially a have a problem with: >>>> >>>> All code donations from external organisations and >>>> existing external projects wishing to join MyFaces enter through the >>>> MyFaces-Incubator. >>>> >>>> This is the Apache Incubator role. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Bernd >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Gerhard Petracek >>>> <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> hi bart, >>>>> >>>>> as mentioned [1] by mark it's also about ip clearance [2]. >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> gerhard >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/201110.mbox/%3c1319274310.93350.yahoomail...@web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com%3E >>>>> [2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html >>>>> >>>>> http://www.irian.at >>>>> >>>>> Your JSF powerhouse - >>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and >>>>> Courses in English and German >>>>> >>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2011/11/1 Bart Kummel <b...@kummelweb.nl> >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for the idea! >>>>>> I agree with Bernd about the name. For me, "incubator" is also >>>>>> associated with rules and legal stuff. We should encourage people to >>>>>> contribute, instead of scaring them away. "Sandbox" or "labs" sounds >>>>>> encouraging and accessible. But perhaps we should discuss/vote the name >>>>>> in another thread and first focus on the idea... >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Bart Kummel >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 01:36, Gerhard Petracek >>>>>> <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> in order to check if there is a community for a new sub-project (esp. >>>>>>> GSoC projects for MyFaces), we discussed [1] the introduction of an >>>>>>> internal incubator. >>>>>>> We would release such projects early and e.g. after a quarter we >>>>>>> decide if we keep and promote a project (as a sub-project or a module >>>>>>> of an existing sub-project) or if we drop it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please vote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [+1] I like the idea >>>>>>> [0] I'm not convinced but I'm ok with it >>>>>>> [-1] I don't agree >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Gerhard >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/d7oogfabvliwn7fg >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >
