I am not sure that this part of the process has to remain as it is. > Unfortunately that is not going to change a whole lot. Just as the > development effort is self directed so is the Documentation effort and > all volunteers are advised of that.
If we can increase participation in the documentation work by having someone to assign tasks to others, that seems like a reasonable change to make. I am willing to take on coordinating the assignments if others can help create a reasonable list of tasks. To be clear, if someone wants to be self directed, that would be great. If someone feels more comfortable being given a task, having a specific person to contact for help and perhaps having a little checking in on progress, I can do that. I have no training in technical writing. I took a quick look at DocBook and it does not seem conceptually difficult, so I can try to learn that. If someone can give me a little help at first, I would appreciate it. If you are wondering who I am, I have been a moderator on the user forum for about 10 years. Francis On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:58 AM Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: > On 5/31/2020 10:41 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > > Am 31.05.20 um 02:41 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > > > >> Another would be to use Docbook, though this is not as appealing as I > >> have no familiarity with it and it appears that there is a steep > >> learning curve to its use and that would be a disadvantage to attracting > >> new people. > > > > The SUSE documenters use(d) Docbook to create multiple targets for > > documentation. > > I like the idea of DocBook and since AOO will create the version 4.1.2 > DTD for the XML structure the learning curve for a volunteer is greatly > reduced. The learning curve would be myself and hopefully others in > learning how to generate the different formats for distribution. > > > > They presented their way on FOSDEM in 2017, for LO. It was very > > interesting. But I dont know if they stick to it, because LO shifted all > > documentation into the web. > > > > And created a Platform similar to pootle. (I never looked at it, just > > what I picked up from my FOSDEM visits) > > From What I can see from a cursory inspection of there documentation > pages they have taken over the old ODF Authors site At least that is > where the link in the old documentation from ODF Authors redirects to. > > > >> > >> I look forward to any other suggestions that could move this effort > >> along as it has languished for far to long. > > > > IMHO the first step is to create a plan. Dividing the plan into work > > packages that can be promoted is important. > > > > Because all people who expressed interest expected they are told what > > needs to be done where. They did not felt > > > > comfortable to figure that out on their own. > > Unfortunately that is not going to change a whole lot. Just as the > development effort is self directed so is the Documentation effort and > all volunteers are advised of that. One the the ultimate goals I have in > mind is to re-invigorate doc@ as the place for all things related to > documentation to help create the the community that will be necessary.. > > > > Also socializing seems to be important. The volunteers do not want to > > work "alone". They want to be part of something. > > > > How it is done, did not seem so important to me on first spot. > > > > > > I just want to point out, since I had multiple discussions now. ProOOBox > > (Jörg care to share some details?) is working on a documentation update. > > > > Integrating them would be very nice from my stand point. > > Yes it would be, but could take a large translation effort if the > Documentation they produce is not currently in English > > > > > > That is my experience from Recruiting and AOO ComDev efforts I have been > > involved in. > > > > > > HTH > > > > Peter > > >