Thanks Houston for looking at that. I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18004 to address this and spoke with David offline about this. That part of the UI is partially broken, specifically disk usage, request rates (not calculated in solr anymore) and collection stats such as num docs and sizes.
Other parts of the UI (nodes, CPU, heap, collection and replicas) should be fine since that collects from a different endpoint that isn't metrics. There is also another problem with solr doing an aggregation for the metrics which is no longer possible (see my comment on the jira for more insight) and blocked because of CORS in the UI. If we want to get the RC early next week, maybe we can hide just those metrics for now and fix it in maybe a 10.1. If we want it fix before then, need to look into getting around CORS with some jetty configuration. From: [email protected] At: 11/26/25 18:37:01 UTC-5:00To: [email protected] Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Hey Anshum, this is a somewhat big change but is mostly just refactoring a class. I'd love to get it in for 10.0 though, since its a huge usability improvement for debugging remote errors. https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1657 As an aside, I'm pretty sure the Admin > Cloud > Nodes screen is broken in 10.0 currently because it uses the JSON metrics format, which is no longer available... We probably want to delay until that is fixed. - Houston On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 10:28 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > Go for it, David. I’ll try and get to it this week but want things to be > stable this week at the very least. I intend to build the RC early next > week if not by the end of this week. > > Anshum Gupta > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 05:42 David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Anshum, when do you expect to build the RC? > > > > BTW I have a number of PRs open in relation to solrj-jetty module or > > SolrClient rename / disentanglement; basically all PRs created by me in > the > > past ~2 weeks. > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20is%3Apr%20author%3Adsmiley > > most need a code review but I'm tempted to just get merging... > > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 2:32 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Go for it and thanks for letting me know, Eric. > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 4:58 AM David Eric Pugh <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, I'd like to get in > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15442 / > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3814 which is renaming the > various > > > > Jetty related hosts and port names. > > > > We missed it for the Solr 8 to 9 jump, and having it just on main > will > > > > make backporting a pain. > > > > I need to manually test the install script and then it could be > merged, > > > > maybe tomorrow, Nov 5th. > > > > On Thursday, October 23, 2025 at 04:52:49 PM EDT, Anshum Gupta < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I did think about that, but finally opted to follow the release > > wizard. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:03 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ugh; I'm realizing now that we have a branch_10_0. I haven't been > > > > > backporting intended changes to there from branch_10x. I'll get to > > > some > > > > of > > > > > them ~now. I thought that for a major release, branch_10x is in > > effect > > > > the > > > > > release branch. Until 10 is actually released, why would we commit > > to > > > > > main, branch_10x, and *not* branch_10_0? The answer is stuff going > > to > > > > 10.1 > > > > > but really can't we just defer back-porting such changes? Then the > > RM > > > > can > > > > > just merge branch_10x into branch_10_0 instead of us all do yet > > another > > > > > cherry pick for every change. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 3:21 PM Alessandro Benedetti < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Anshum. A quick update after your confirmation: > > > > > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 (renaming) -> > > > > should > > > > > be > > > > > > ready by tomorrow > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new type of > > knn > > > > > > query) *-> > > > > > > Ported to 10.0* > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new type of > > > filter > > > > > > parameters for knn query) *-> Ported to 10.0* > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big Learning > > To > > > > Rank > > > > > > improvement) *-> Ported to 10.0* > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > -------------------------- > > > > > > *Alessandro Benedetti* > > > > > > Director @ Sease Ltd. > > > > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > > > > > *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* > > > > > > > > > > > > e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > > > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > > > > > > > > > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > > > > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > > > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | > > Github > > > > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 at 17:41, Anshum Gupta < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Alessandro, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This looks good. Thanks for the contributions :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 2:42 AM Alessandro Benedetti < > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Anshum, > > > > > > > > we are finalizing some cool features related to vector search > > and > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > learning (learning to Rank), > > > > > > > > We should merge them in the next couple of days max > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 > (renaming) > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new type > > of > > > > knn > > > > > > > query) > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new type > > of > > > > > filter > > > > > > > > parameters for knn query) > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big > > Learning > > > > To > > > > > > Rank > > > > > > > > improvement) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would love to see them in 10.0. > > > > > > > > We'll port them to 10.x, let us know if we can port them to > > 10.0 > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > -------------------------- > > > > > > > > *Alessandro Benedetti* > > > > > > > > Director @ Sease Ltd. > > > > > > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > > > > > > > *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > > > > > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > > > > > > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > > > > > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | > > > > Github > > > > > > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 at 19:45, Anshum Gupta < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds good, James. Thanks for checking with me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Anshum > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 9:14 AM James Dyer < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am about to include SOLR-17771 (#3774) in the new 10.0 > > > > branch. > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > > is to make CloudHttp2SolrClient to work with the new Jdk > > > > client. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 3:37 PM Anshum Gupta < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *NOTICE:* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Branch branch_10_0 has been cut and versions updated to > > > 10.1 > > > > on > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > stable > > > > > > > > > > > branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please observe the normal rules of "No new features may > > be > > > > > > > committed > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > branch without checking in with the RM". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As this is a major release, we'll be spending more time > > > > > > stabilizing > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > than minor releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Anshum Gupta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Anshum Gupta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Anshum Gupta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Anshum Gupta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Anshum Gupta > > > > > >
