Hi, I added https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18006 as a blocker for 10.0. It was reported yesterday and I easily reproduced it in 5 mins. Have not dived deeper... Probably some recent lucene changes that have caused this?
Jan > 1. des. 2025 kl. 05:53 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya <[email protected]>: > > Hi Anshum > I'm planning to get SOLR-17927 in by today. Can you please wait for that > one? Apologies for the delay. > Regards, > Ishan > > On Fri, 28 Nov, 2025, 11:30 pm Matthew Biscocho (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK), < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Houston for looking at that. I created >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18004 to address this and >> spoke with David offline about this. That part of the UI is partially >> broken, specifically disk usage, request rates (not calculated in solr >> anymore) and collection stats such as num docs and sizes. >> >> Other parts of the UI (nodes, CPU, heap, collection and replicas) should >> be fine since that collects from a different endpoint that isn't metrics. >> There is also another problem with solr doing an aggregation for the >> metrics which is no longer possible (see my comment on the jira for more >> insight) and blocked because of CORS in the UI. If we want to get the RC >> early next week, maybe we can hide just those metrics for now and fix it in >> maybe a 10.1. If we want it fix before then, need to look into getting >> around CORS with some jetty configuration. >> >> From: [email protected] At: 11/26/25 18:37:01 UTC-5:00To: >> [email protected] >> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 >> >> Hey Anshum, this is a somewhat big change but is mostly just refactoring a >> class. I'd love to get it in for 10.0 though, since its a huge usability >> improvement for debugging remote errors. >> >> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1657 >> >> As an aside, I'm pretty sure the Admin > Cloud > Nodes screen is broken in >> 10.0 currently because it uses the JSON metrics format, which is no longer >> available... We probably want to delay until that is fixed. >> >> - Houston >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 10:28 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Go for it, David. I’ll try and get to it this week but want things to be >>> stable this week at the very least. I intend to build the RC early next >>> week if not by the end of this week. >>> >>> Anshum Gupta >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 05:42 David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Anshum, when do you expect to build the RC? >>>> >>>> BTW I have a number of PRs open in relation to solrj-jetty module or >>>> SolrClient rename / disentanglement; basically all PRs created by me in >>> the >>>> past ~2 weeks. >>>> >>>> >>> >> https://github.com/apache/solr/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20is%3Apr%20author%3Adsmiley >>>> most need a code review but I'm tempted to just get merging... >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 2:32 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Go for it and thanks for letting me know, Eric. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 4:58 AM David Eric Pugh >> <[email protected] >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, I'd like to get in >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15442 / >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3814 which is renaming the >>> various >>>>>> Jetty related hosts and port names. >>>>>> We missed it for the Solr 8 to 9 jump, and having it just on main >>> will >>>>>> make backporting a pain. >>>>>> I need to manually test the install script and then it could be >>> merged, >>>>>> maybe tomorrow, Nov 5th. >>>>>> On Thursday, October 23, 2025 at 04:52:49 PM EDT, Anshum Gupta >> < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I did think about that, but finally opted to follow the release >>>> wizard. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:03 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ugh; I'm realizing now that we have a branch_10_0. I haven't >> been >>>>>>> backporting intended changes to there from branch_10x. I'll get >> to >>>>> some >>>>>> of >>>>>>> them ~now. I thought that for a major release, branch_10x is in >>>> effect >>>>>> the >>>>>>> release branch. Until 10 is actually released, why would we >> commit >>>> to >>>>>>> main, branch_10x, and *not* branch_10_0? The answer is stuff >> going >>>> to >>>>>> 10.1 >>>>>>> but really can't we just defer back-porting such changes? Then >> the >>>> RM >>>>>> can >>>>>>> just merge branch_10x into branch_10_0 instead of us all do yet >>>> another >>>>>>> cherry pick for every change. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 3:21 PM Alessandro Benedetti < >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, Anshum. A quick update after your confirmation: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 (renaming) >> -> >>>>>> should >>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> ready by tomorrow >>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new type >> of >>>> knn >>>>>>>> query) *-> >>>>>>>> Ported to 10.0* >>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new type >> of >>>>> filter >>>>>>>> parameters for knn query) *-> Ported to 10.0* >>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big >> Learning >>>> To >>>>>> Rank >>>>>>>> improvement) *-> Ported to 10.0* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> -------------------------- >>>>>>>> *Alessandro Benedetti* >>>>>>>> Director @ Sease Ltd. >>>>>>>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* >>>>>>>> *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied >>>>>>>> Consulting | Training | Open Source >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> >>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter >>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube >>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | >>>> Github >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/seaseltd> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 at 17:41, Anshum Gupta < >>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey Alessandro, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This looks good. Thanks for the contributions :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 2:42 AM Alessandro Benedetti < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey Anshum, >>>>>>>>>> we are finalizing some cool features related to vector >> search >>>> and >>>>>>>> machine >>>>>>>>>> learning (learning to Rank), >>>>>>>>>> We should merge them in the next couple of days max >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 >>> (renaming) >>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new >> type >>>> of >>>>>> knn >>>>>>>>> query) >>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new >> type >>>> of >>>>>>> filter >>>>>>>>>> parameters for knn query) >>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big >>>> Learning >>>>>> To >>>>>>>> Rank >>>>>>>>>> improvement) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I would love to see them in 10.0. >>>>>>>>>> We'll port them to 10.x, let us know if we can port them to >>>> 10.0 >>>>>> too. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>> -------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> *Alessandro Benedetti* >>>>>>>>>> Director @ Sease Ltd. >>>>>>>>>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* >>>>>>>>>> *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied >>>>>>>>>> Consulting | Training | Open Source >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> >>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | >> Twitter >>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> >> | >>>>>> Github >>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/seaseltd> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 at 19:45, Anshum Gupta < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, James. Thanks for checking with me. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 9:14 AM James Dyer < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I am about to include SOLR-17771 (#3774) in the new >> 10.0 >>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>> This >>>>>>>>>>>> is to make CloudHttp2SolrClient to work with the new >> Jdk >>>>>> client. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 3:37 PM Anshum Gupta < >>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *NOTICE:* >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Branch branch_10_0 has been cut and versions updated >> to >>>>> 10.1 >>>>>> on >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> stable >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please observe the normal rules of "No new features >> may >>>> be >>>>>>>>> committed >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch without checking in with the RM". >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As this is a major release, we'll be spending more >> time >>>>>>>> stabilizing >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>> than minor releases. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum Gupta >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
