Hi Anshum I'm planning to get SOLR-17927 in by today. Can you please wait for that one? Apologies for the delay. Regards, Ishan
On Fri, 28 Nov, 2025, 11:30 pm Matthew Biscocho (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK), < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Houston for looking at that. I created > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18004 to address this and > spoke with David offline about this. That part of the UI is partially > broken, specifically disk usage, request rates (not calculated in solr > anymore) and collection stats such as num docs and sizes. > > Other parts of the UI (nodes, CPU, heap, collection and replicas) should > be fine since that collects from a different endpoint that isn't metrics. > There is also another problem with solr doing an aggregation for the > metrics which is no longer possible (see my comment on the jira for more > insight) and blocked because of CORS in the UI. If we want to get the RC > early next week, maybe we can hide just those metrics for now and fix it in > maybe a 10.1. If we want it fix before then, need to look into getting > around CORS with some jetty configuration. > > From: [email protected] At: 11/26/25 18:37:01 UTC-5:00To: > [email protected] > Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 > > Hey Anshum, this is a somewhat big change but is mostly just refactoring a > class. I'd love to get it in for 10.0 though, since its a huge usability > improvement for debugging remote errors. > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1657 > > As an aside, I'm pretty sure the Admin > Cloud > Nodes screen is broken in > 10.0 currently because it uses the JSON metrics format, which is no longer > available... We probably want to delay until that is fixed. > > - Houston > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 10:28 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Go for it, David. I’ll try and get to it this week but want things to be > > stable this week at the very least. I intend to build the RC early next > > week if not by the end of this week. > > > > Anshum Gupta > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 05:42 David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Anshum, when do you expect to build the RC? > > > > > > BTW I have a number of PRs open in relation to solrj-jetty module or > > > SolrClient rename / disentanglement; basically all PRs created by me in > > the > > > past ~2 weeks. > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20is%3Apr%20author%3Adsmiley > > > most need a code review but I'm tempted to just get merging... > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 2:32 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Go for it and thanks for letting me know, Eric. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 4:58 AM David Eric Pugh > <[email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, I'd like to get in > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15442 / > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3814 which is renaming the > > various > > > > > Jetty related hosts and port names. > > > > > We missed it for the Solr 8 to 9 jump, and having it just on main > > will > > > > > make backporting a pain. > > > > > I need to manually test the install script and then it could be > > merged, > > > > > maybe tomorrow, Nov 5th. > > > > > On Thursday, October 23, 2025 at 04:52:49 PM EDT, Anshum Gupta > < > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I did think about that, but finally opted to follow the release > > > wizard. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:03 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Ugh; I'm realizing now that we have a branch_10_0. I haven't > been > > > > > > backporting intended changes to there from branch_10x. I'll get > to > > > > some > > > > > of > > > > > > them ~now. I thought that for a major release, branch_10x is in > > > effect > > > > > the > > > > > > release branch. Until 10 is actually released, why would we > commit > > > to > > > > > > main, branch_10x, and *not* branch_10_0? The answer is stuff > going > > > to > > > > > 10.1 > > > > > > but really can't we just defer back-porting such changes? Then > the > > > RM > > > > > can > > > > > > just merge branch_10x into branch_10_0 instead of us all do yet > > > another > > > > > > cherry pick for every change. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 3:21 PM Alessandro Benedetti < > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Anshum. A quick update after your confirmation: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 (renaming) > -> > > > > > should > > > > > > be > > > > > > > ready by tomorrow > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new type > of > > > knn > > > > > > > query) *-> > > > > > > > Ported to 10.0* > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new type > of > > > > filter > > > > > > > parameters for knn query) *-> Ported to 10.0* > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big > Learning > > > To > > > > > Rank > > > > > > > improvement) *-> Ported to 10.0* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > -------------------------- > > > > > > > *Alessandro Benedetti* > > > > > > > Director @ Sease Ltd. > > > > > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > > > > > > *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > > > > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > > > > > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > > > > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | > > > Github > > > > > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 at 17:41, Anshum Gupta < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Alessandro, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This looks good. Thanks for the contributions :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 2:42 AM Alessandro Benedetti < > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Anshum, > > > > > > > > > we are finalizing some cool features related to vector > search > > > and > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > > learning (learning to Rank), > > > > > > > > > We should merge them in the next couple of days max > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 > > (renaming) > > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new > type > > > of > > > > > knn > > > > > > > > query) > > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new > type > > > of > > > > > > filter > > > > > > > > > parameters for knn query) > > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big > > > Learning > > > > > To > > > > > > > Rank > > > > > > > > > improvement) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would love to see them in 10.0. > > > > > > > > > We'll port them to 10.x, let us know if we can port them to > > > 10.0 > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > -------------------------- > > > > > > > > > *Alessandro Benedetti* > > > > > > > > > Director @ Sease Ltd. > > > > > > > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > > > > > > > > *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > > > > > > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > > > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | > Twitter > > > > > > > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > > > > > > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> > | > > > > > Github > > > > > > > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 at 19:45, Anshum Gupta < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds good, James. Thanks for checking with me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Anshum > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 9:14 AM James Dyer < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am about to include SOLR-17771 (#3774) in the new > 10.0 > > > > > branch. > > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > > > is to make CloudHttp2SolrClient to work with the new > Jdk > > > > > client. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 3:37 PM Anshum Gupta < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *NOTICE:* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Branch branch_10_0 has been cut and versions updated > to > > > > 10.1 > > > > > on > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > stable > > > > > > > > > > > > branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please observe the normal rules of "No new features > may > > > be > > > > > > > > committed > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > branch without checking in with the RM". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As this is a major release, we'll be spending more > time > > > > > > > stabilizing > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > than minor releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Anshum Gupta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Anshum Gupta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Anshum Gupta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Anshum Gupta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Anshum Gupta > > > > > > > > > > > >
