My error response info change is in. - Houston
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 7:38 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > SOLR-18006 has a work-around and was an issue starting in 9.9. IMO not > blocker-worthy if I was the RM. > > I finished porting the SolrJ changes I *really* wanted to do for 10. Jetty > stuff is at least in a package with suitable naming, albeit not yet a > subproject/module. A bunch of classes were moved as well. While there's > no general HttpSolrClient yet either, it can be added. > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 9:57 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I added https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18006 as a blocker > for > > 10.0. It was reported yesterday and I easily reproduced it in 5 mins. > Have > > not dived deeper... Probably some recent lucene changes that have caused > > this? > > > > Jan > > > > > 1. des. 2025 kl. 05:53 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > [email protected]>: > > > > > > Hi Anshum > > > I'm planning to get SOLR-17927 in by today. Can you please wait for > that > > > one? Apologies for the delay. > > > Regards, > > > Ishan > > > > > > On Fri, 28 Nov, 2025, 11:30 pm Matthew Biscocho (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK), > < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks Houston for looking at that. I created > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18004 to address this and > > >> spoke with David offline about this. That part of the UI is partially > > >> broken, specifically disk usage, request rates (not calculated in solr > > >> anymore) and collection stats such as num docs and sizes. > > >> > > >> Other parts of the UI (nodes, CPU, heap, collection and replicas) > should > > >> be fine since that collects from a different endpoint that isn't > > metrics. > > >> There is also another problem with solr doing an aggregation for the > > >> metrics which is no longer possible (see my comment on the jira for > more > > >> insight) and blocked because of CORS in the UI. If we want to get the > RC > > >> early next week, maybe we can hide just those metrics for now and fix > > it in > > >> maybe a 10.1. If we want it fix before then, need to look into getting > > >> around CORS with some jetty configuration. > > >> > > >> From: [email protected] At: 11/26/25 18:37:01 UTC-5:00To: > > >> [email protected] > > >> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 > > >> > > >> Hey Anshum, this is a somewhat big change but is mostly just > > refactoring a > > >> class. I'd love to get it in for 10.0 though, since its a huge > usability > > >> improvement for debugging remote errors. > > >> > > >> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1657 > > >> > > >> As an aside, I'm pretty sure the Admin > Cloud > Nodes screen is > broken > > in > > >> 10.0 currently because it uses the JSON metrics format, which is no > > longer > > >> available... We probably want to delay until that is fixed. > > >> > > >> - Houston > > >> > > >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 10:28 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected] > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Go for it, David. I’ll try and get to it this week but want things to > > be > > >>> stable this week at the very least. I intend to build the RC early > next > > >>> week if not by the end of this week. > > >>> > > >>> Anshum Gupta > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 05:42 David Smiley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Anshum, when do you expect to build the RC? > > >>>> > > >>>> BTW I have a number of PRs open in relation to solrj-jetty module or > > >>>> SolrClient rename / disentanglement; basically all PRs created by me > > in > > >>> the > > >>>> past ~2 weeks. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20is%3Apr%20author%3Adsmiley > > >>>> most need a code review but I'm tempted to just get merging... > > >>>> > > >>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 2:32 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected] > > > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Go for it and thanks for letting me know, Eric. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 4:58 AM David Eric Pugh > > >> <[email protected] > > >>>> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi all, I'd like to get in > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15442 / > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3814 which is renaming the > > >>> various > > >>>>>> Jetty related hosts and port names. > > >>>>>> We missed it for the Solr 8 to 9 jump, and having it just on main > > >>> will > > >>>>>> make backporting a pain. > > >>>>>> I need to manually test the install script and then it could be > > >>> merged, > > >>>>>> maybe tomorrow, Nov 5th. > > >>>>>> On Thursday, October 23, 2025 at 04:52:49 PM EDT, Anshum Gupta > > >> < > > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I did think about that, but finally opted to follow the release > > >>>> wizard. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:03 AM David Smiley <[email protected] > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Ugh; I'm realizing now that we have a branch_10_0. I haven't > > >> been > > >>>>>>> backporting intended changes to there from branch_10x. I'll get > > >> to > > >>>>> some > > >>>>>> of > > >>>>>>> them ~now. I thought that for a major release, branch_10x is in > > >>>> effect > > >>>>>> the > > >>>>>>> release branch. Until 10 is actually released, why would we > > >> commit > > >>>> to > > >>>>>>> main, branch_10x, and *not* branch_10_0? The answer is stuff > > >> going > > >>>> to > > >>>>>> 10.1 > > >>>>>>> but really can't we just defer back-porting such changes? Then > > >> the > > >>>> RM > > >>>>>> can > > >>>>>>> just merge branch_10x into branch_10_0 instead of us all do yet > > >>>> another > > >>>>>>> cherry pick for every change. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 3:21 PM Alessandro Benedetti < > > >>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks, Anshum. A quick update after your confirmation: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 (renaming) > > >> -> > > >>>>>> should > > >>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>> ready by tomorrow > > >>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new type > > >> of > > >>>> knn > > >>>>>>>> query) *-> > > >>>>>>>> Ported to 10.0* > > >>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new type > > >> of > > >>>>> filter > > >>>>>>>> parameters for knn query) *-> Ported to 10.0* > > >>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big > > >> Learning > > >>>> To > > >>>>>> Rank > > >>>>>>>> improvement) *-> Ported to 10.0* > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Cheers > > >>>>>>>> -------------------------- > > >>>>>>>> *Alessandro Benedetti* > > >>>>>>>> Director @ Sease Ltd. > > >>>>>>>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > >>>>>>>> *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > >>>>>>>> Consulting | Training | Open Source > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > >>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > > >>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > >>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | > > >>>> Github > > >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 at 17:41, Anshum Gupta < > > >>> [email protected] > > >>>>> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Hey Alessandro, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> This looks good. Thanks for the contributions :) > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 2:42 AM Alessandro Benedetti < > > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hey Anshum, > > >>>>>>>>>> we are finalizing some cool features related to vector > > >> search > > >>>> and > > >>>>>>>> machine > > >>>>>>>>>> learning (learning to Rank), > > >>>>>>>>>> We should merge them in the next couple of days max > > >>>>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 > > >>> (renaming) > > >>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new > > >> type > > >>>> of > > >>>>>> knn > > >>>>>>>>> query) > > >>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new > > >> type > > >>>> of > > >>>>>>> filter > > >>>>>>>>>> parameters for knn query) > > >>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big > > >>>> Learning > > >>>>>> To > > >>>>>>>> Rank > > >>>>>>>>>> improvement) > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I would love to see them in 10.0. > > >>>>>>>>>> We'll port them to 10.x, let us know if we can port them to > > >>>> 10.0 > > >>>>>> too. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers > > >>>>>>>>>> -------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>>> *Alessandro Benedetti* > > >>>>>>>>>> Director @ Sease Ltd. > > >>>>>>>>>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > >>>>>>>>>> *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > >>>>>>>>>> Consulting | Training | Open Source > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > >>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | > > >> Twitter > > >>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> > > >> | > > >>>>>> Github > > >>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 at 19:45, Anshum Gupta < > > >>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, James. Thanks for checking with me. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 9:14 AM James Dyer < > > >>>>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I am about to include SOLR-17771 (#3774) in the new > > >> 10.0 > > >>>>>> branch. > > >>>>>>>>> This > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is to make CloudHttp2SolrClient to work with the new > > >> Jdk > > >>>>>> client. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 3:37 PM Anshum Gupta < > > >>>>>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *NOTICE:* > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Branch branch_10_0 has been cut and versions updated > > >> to > > >>>>> 10.1 > > >>>>>> on > > >>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> stable > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please observe the normal rules of "No new features > > >> may > > >>>> be > > >>>>>>>>> committed > > >>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch without checking in with the RM". > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> As this is a major release, we'll be spending more > > >> time > > >>>>>>>> stabilizing > > >>>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> than minor releases. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum Gupta > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > > >>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Anshum Gupta > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Anshum Gupta > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
