Hi Anshum, > @Ishan - I'm waiting for the vector naming changes to be merged. I don't > want to rush so let me know once this is done.
I've completed this. If you don't have an objection, I think we should also have this one SOLR-17928 as well. Please feel free to ignore it if I don't wrap this up by today. Thanks and regards, Ishan On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 at 19:23, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: > SOLR-18006 is fixed by me and David and merged. The issue was was how Solr > was holding Lucene in certain situations :-) Thanks Claude for drafting a > fix. > > Jan > > > 2. des. 2025 kl. 18:33 skrev Anshum Gupta <[email protected]>: > > > > Thanks Houston. > > > > @Ishan - I'm waiting for the vector naming changes to be merged. I don't > > want to rush so let me know once this is done. > > > > @Jan - I think it makes sense to fix this. I just read the description > and > > it seems like what you suggest w.r.t a Lucene change causing this > behavior. > > Do you intend on taking a look at this today/tomorrow? > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 9:24 AM Houston Putman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> My error response info change is in. > >> > >> - Houston > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 7:38 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> SOLR-18006 has a work-around and was an issue starting in 9.9. IMO not > >>> blocker-worthy if I was the RM. > >>> > >>> I finished porting the SolrJ changes I *really* wanted to do for 10. > >> Jetty > >>> stuff is at least in a package with suitable naming, albeit not yet a > >>> subproject/module. A bunch of classes were moved as well. While > there's > >>> no general HttpSolrClient yet either, it can be added. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 9:57 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I added https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18006 as a blocker > >>> for > >>>> 10.0. It was reported yesterday and I easily reproduced it in 5 mins. > >>> Have > >>>> not dived deeper... Probably some recent lucene changes that have > >> caused > >>>> this? > >>>> > >>>> Jan > >>>> > >>>>> 1. des. 2025 kl. 05:53 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > >>>> [email protected]>: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Anshum > >>>>> I'm planning to get SOLR-17927 in by today. Can you please wait for > >>> that > >>>>> one? Apologies for the delay. > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Ishan > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, 28 Nov, 2025, 11:30 pm Matthew Biscocho (BLOOMBERG/ 120 > >> PARK), > >>> < > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks Houston for looking at that. I created > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18004 to address this > >> and > >>>>>> spoke with David offline about this. That part of the UI is > >> partially > >>>>>> broken, specifically disk usage, request rates (not calculated in > >> solr > >>>>>> anymore) and collection stats such as num docs and sizes. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Other parts of the UI (nodes, CPU, heap, collection and replicas) > >>> should > >>>>>> be fine since that collects from a different endpoint that isn't > >>>> metrics. > >>>>>> There is also another problem with solr doing an aggregation for the > >>>>>> metrics which is no longer possible (see my comment on the jira for > >>> more > >>>>>> insight) and blocked because of CORS in the UI. If we want to get > >> the > >>> RC > >>>>>> early next week, maybe we can hide just those metrics for now and > >> fix > >>>> it in > >>>>>> maybe a 10.1. If we want it fix before then, need to look into > >> getting > >>>>>> around CORS with some jetty configuration. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From: [email protected] At: 11/26/25 18:37:01 UTC-5:00To: > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hey Anshum, this is a somewhat big change but is mostly just > >>>> refactoring a > >>>>>> class. I'd love to get it in for 10.0 though, since its a huge > >>> usability > >>>>>> improvement for debugging remote errors. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1657 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As an aside, I'm pretty sure the Admin > Cloud > Nodes screen is > >>> broken > >>>> in > >>>>>> 10.0 currently because it uses the JSON metrics format, which is no > >>>> longer > >>>>>> available... We probably want to delay until that is fixed. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Houston > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 10:28 PM Anshum Gupta < > >> [email protected] > >>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Go for it, David. I’ll try and get to it this week but want things > >> to > >>>> be > >>>>>>> stable this week at the very least. I intend to build the RC early > >>> next > >>>>>>> week if not by the end of this week. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Anshum Gupta > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 05:42 David Smiley <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Anshum, when do you expect to build the RC? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> BTW I have a number of PRs open in relation to solrj-jetty module > >> or > >>>>>>>> SolrClient rename / disentanglement; basically all PRs created by > >> me > >>>> in > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>> past ~2 weeks. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://github.com/apache/solr/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20is%3Apr%20author%3Adsmiley > >>>>>>>> most need a code review but I'm tempted to just get merging... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 2:32 PM Anshum Gupta < > >> [email protected] > >>>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Go for it and thanks for letting me know, Eric. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 4:58 AM David Eric Pugh > >>>>>> <[email protected] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, I'd like to get in > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15442 / > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3814 which is renaming the > >>>>>>> various > >>>>>>>>>> Jetty related hosts and port names. > >>>>>>>>>> We missed it for the Solr 8 to 9 jump, and having it just on > >> main > >>>>>>> will > >>>>>>>>>> make backporting a pain. > >>>>>>>>>> I need to manually test the install script and then it could be > >>>>>>> merged, > >>>>>>>>>> maybe tomorrow, Nov 5th. > >>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, October 23, 2025 at 04:52:49 PM EDT, Anshum > >> Gupta > >>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I did think about that, but finally opted to follow the release > >>>>>>>> wizard. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:03 AM David Smiley < > >> [email protected] > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Ugh; I'm realizing now that we have a branch_10_0. I haven't > >>>>>> been > >>>>>>>>>>> backporting intended changes to there from branch_10x. I'll > >> get > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> some > >>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>> them ~now. I thought that for a major release, branch_10x is > >> in > >>>>>>>> effect > >>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> release branch. Until 10 is actually released, why would we > >>>>>> commit > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>> main, branch_10x, and *not* branch_10_0? The answer is stuff > >>>>>> going > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>> 10.1 > >>>>>>>>>>> but really can't we just defer back-porting such changes? Then > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>> RM > >>>>>>>>>> can > >>>>>>>>>>> just merge branch_10x into branch_10_0 instead of us all do yet > >>>>>>>> another > >>>>>>>>>>> cherry pick for every change. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 3:21 PM Alessandro Benedetti < > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Anshum. A quick update after your confirmation: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 (renaming) > >>>>>> -> > >>>>>>>>>> should > >>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>> ready by tomorrow > >>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new type > >>>>>> of > >>>>>>>> knn > >>>>>>>>>>>> query) *-> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ported to 10.0* > >>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new type > >>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>> filter > >>>>>>>>>>>> parameters for knn query) *-> Ported to 10.0* > >>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big > >>>>>> Learning > >>>>>>>> To > >>>>>>>>>> Rank > >>>>>>>>>>>> improvement) *-> Ported to 10.0* > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers > >>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Alessandro Benedetti* > >>>>>>>>>>>> Director @ Sease Ltd. > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > >>>>>>>>>>>> Consulting | Training | Open Source > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > >>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | > >>>>>>>> Github > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/seaseltd> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 at 17:41, Anshum Gupta < > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Alessandro, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks good. Thanks for the contributions :) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 2:42 AM Alessandro Benedetti < > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Anshum, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we are finalizing some cool features related to vector > >>>>>> search > >>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>> machine > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> learning (learning to Rank), > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should merge them in the next couple of days max > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 > >>>>>>> (renaming) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new > >>>>>> type > >>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>> knn > >>>>>>>>>>>>> query) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new > >>>>>> type > >>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>> filter > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameters for knn query) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big > >>>>>>>> Learning > >>>>>>>>>> To > >>>>>>>>>>>> Rank > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would love to see them in 10.0. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We'll port them to 10.x, let us know if we can port them to > >>>>>>>> 10.0 > >>>>>>>>>> too. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alessandro Benedetti* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Director @ Sease Ltd. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Consulting | Training | Open Source > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | > >>>>>> Twitter > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> > >>>>>> | > >>>>>>>>>> Github > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/seaseltd> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 at 19:45, Anshum Gupta < > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, James. Thanks for checking with me. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 9:14 AM James Dyer < > >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am about to include SOLR-17771 (#3774) in the new > >>>>>> 10.0 > >>>>>>>>>> branch. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is to make CloudHttp2SolrClient to work with the new > >>>>>> Jdk > >>>>>>>>>> client. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 3:37 PM Anshum Gupta < > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NOTICE:* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Branch branch_10_0 has been cut and versions updated > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> 10.1 > >>>>>>>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stable > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please observe the normal rules of "No new features > >>>>>> may > >>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>> committed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch without checking in with the RM". > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As this is a major release, we'll be spending more > >>>>>> time > >>>>>>>>>>>> stabilizing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than minor releases. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum Gupta > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
