Thanks Houston. @Ishan - I'm waiting for the vector naming changes to be merged. I don't want to rush so let me know once this is done.
@Jan - I think it makes sense to fix this. I just read the description and it seems like what you suggest w.r.t a Lucene change causing this behavior. Do you intend on taking a look at this today/tomorrow? On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 9:24 AM Houston Putman <[email protected]> wrote: > My error response info change is in. > > - Houston > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 7:38 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > SOLR-18006 has a work-around and was an issue starting in 9.9. IMO not > > blocker-worthy if I was the RM. > > > > I finished porting the SolrJ changes I *really* wanted to do for 10. > Jetty > > stuff is at least in a package with suitable naming, albeit not yet a > > subproject/module. A bunch of classes were moved as well. While there's > > no general HttpSolrClient yet either, it can be added. > > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 9:57 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I added https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18006 as a blocker > > for > > > 10.0. It was reported yesterday and I easily reproduced it in 5 mins. > > Have > > > not dived deeper... Probably some recent lucene changes that have > caused > > > this? > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > 1. des. 2025 kl. 05:53 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > > [email protected]>: > > > > > > > > Hi Anshum > > > > I'm planning to get SOLR-17927 in by today. Can you please wait for > > that > > > > one? Apologies for the delay. > > > > Regards, > > > > Ishan > > > > > > > > On Fri, 28 Nov, 2025, 11:30 pm Matthew Biscocho (BLOOMBERG/ 120 > PARK), > > < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Thanks Houston for looking at that. I created > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18004 to address this > and > > > >> spoke with David offline about this. That part of the UI is > partially > > > >> broken, specifically disk usage, request rates (not calculated in > solr > > > >> anymore) and collection stats such as num docs and sizes. > > > >> > > > >> Other parts of the UI (nodes, CPU, heap, collection and replicas) > > should > > > >> be fine since that collects from a different endpoint that isn't > > > metrics. > > > >> There is also another problem with solr doing an aggregation for the > > > >> metrics which is no longer possible (see my comment on the jira for > > more > > > >> insight) and blocked because of CORS in the UI. If we want to get > the > > RC > > > >> early next week, maybe we can hide just those metrics for now and > fix > > > it in > > > >> maybe a 10.1. If we want it fix before then, need to look into > getting > > > >> around CORS with some jetty configuration. > > > >> > > > >> From: [email protected] At: 11/26/25 18:37:01 UTC-5:00To: > > > >> [email protected] > > > >> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 > > > >> > > > >> Hey Anshum, this is a somewhat big change but is mostly just > > > refactoring a > > > >> class. I'd love to get it in for 10.0 though, since its a huge > > usability > > > >> improvement for debugging remote errors. > > > >> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1657 > > > >> > > > >> As an aside, I'm pretty sure the Admin > Cloud > Nodes screen is > > broken > > > in > > > >> 10.0 currently because it uses the JSON metrics format, which is no > > > longer > > > >> available... We probably want to delay until that is fixed. > > > >> > > > >> - Houston > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 10:28 PM Anshum Gupta < > [email protected] > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Go for it, David. I’ll try and get to it this week but want things > to > > > be > > > >>> stable this week at the very least. I intend to build the RC early > > next > > > >>> week if not by the end of this week. > > > >>> > > > >>> Anshum Gupta > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 05:42 David Smiley <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Anshum, when do you expect to build the RC? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> BTW I have a number of PRs open in relation to solrj-jetty module > or > > > >>>> SolrClient rename / disentanglement; basically all PRs created by > me > > > in > > > >>> the > > > >>>> past ~2 weeks. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20is%3Apr%20author%3Adsmiley > > > >>>> most need a code review but I'm tempted to just get merging... > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 2:32 PM Anshum Gupta < > [email protected] > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Go for it and thanks for letting me know, Eric. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 4:58 AM David Eric Pugh > > > >> <[email protected] > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi all, I'd like to get in > > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15442 / > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3814 which is renaming the > > > >>> various > > > >>>>>> Jetty related hosts and port names. > > > >>>>>> We missed it for the Solr 8 to 9 jump, and having it just on > main > > > >>> will > > > >>>>>> make backporting a pain. > > > >>>>>> I need to manually test the install script and then it could be > > > >>> merged, > > > >>>>>> maybe tomorrow, Nov 5th. > > > >>>>>> On Thursday, October 23, 2025 at 04:52:49 PM EDT, Anshum > Gupta > > > >> < > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I did think about that, but finally opted to follow the release > > > >>>> wizard. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:03 AM David Smiley < > [email protected] > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Ugh; I'm realizing now that we have a branch_10_0. I haven't > > > >> been > > > >>>>>>> backporting intended changes to there from branch_10x. I'll > get > > > >> to > > > >>>>> some > > > >>>>>> of > > > >>>>>>> them ~now. I thought that for a major release, branch_10x is > in > > > >>>> effect > > > >>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>> release branch. Until 10 is actually released, why would we > > > >> commit > > > >>>> to > > > >>>>>>> main, branch_10x, and *not* branch_10_0? The answer is stuff > > > >> going > > > >>>> to > > > >>>>>> 10.1 > > > >>>>>>> but really can't we just defer back-porting such changes? Then > > > >> the > > > >>>> RM > > > >>>>>> can > > > >>>>>>> just merge branch_10x into branch_10_0 instead of us all do yet > > > >>>> another > > > >>>>>>> cherry pick for every change. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 3:21 PM Alessandro Benedetti < > > > >>>>>> [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks, Anshum. A quick update after your confirmation: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 (renaming) > > > >> -> > > > >>>>>> should > > > >>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>> ready by tomorrow > > > >>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new type > > > >> of > > > >>>> knn > > > >>>>>>>> query) *-> > > > >>>>>>>> Ported to 10.0* > > > >>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new type > > > >> of > > > >>>>> filter > > > >>>>>>>> parameters for knn query) *-> Ported to 10.0* > > > >>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big > > > >> Learning > > > >>>> To > > > >>>>>> Rank > > > >>>>>>>> improvement) *-> Ported to 10.0* > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Cheers > > > >>>>>>>> -------------------------- > > > >>>>>>>> *Alessandro Benedetti* > > > >>>>>>>> Director @ Sease Ltd. > > > >>>>>>>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > > >>>>>>>> *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> e-mail: [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > > >>>>>>>> Consulting | Training | Open Source > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > > >>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > > > >>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > > >>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | > > > >>>> Github > > > >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 at 17:41, Anshum Gupta < > > > >>> [email protected] > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hey Alessandro, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> This looks good. Thanks for the contributions :) > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 2:42 AM Alessandro Benedetti < > > > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hey Anshum, > > > >>>>>>>>>> we are finalizing some cool features related to vector > > > >> search > > > >>>> and > > > >>>>>>>> machine > > > >>>>>>>>>> learning (learning to Rank), > > > >>>>>>>>>> We should merge them in the next couple of days max > > > >>>>>>>>>> : > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 > > > >>> (renaming) > > > >>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new > > > >> type > > > >>>> of > > > >>>>>> knn > > > >>>>>>>>> query) > > > >>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new > > > >> type > > > >>>> of > > > >>>>>>> filter > > > >>>>>>>>>> parameters for knn query) > > > >>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big > > > >>>> Learning > > > >>>>>> To > > > >>>>>>>> Rank > > > >>>>>>>>>> improvement) > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I would love to see them in 10.0. > > > >>>>>>>>>> We'll port them to 10.x, let us know if we can port them to > > > >>>> 10.0 > > > >>>>>> too. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers > > > >>>>>>>>>> -------------------------- > > > >>>>>>>>>> *Alessandro Benedetti* > > > >>>>>>>>>> Director @ Sease Ltd. > > > >>>>>>>>>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > > >>>>>>>>>> *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> e-mail: [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > > >>>>>>>>>> Consulting | Training | Open Source > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > > >>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | > > > >> Twitter > > > >>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> > > > >> | > > > >>>>>> Github > > > >>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 at 19:45, Anshum Gupta < > > > >>>>> [email protected] > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, James. Thanks for checking with me. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 9:14 AM James Dyer < > > > >>>>> [email protected]> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I am about to include SOLR-17771 (#3774) in the new > > > >> 10.0 > > > >>>>>> branch. > > > >>>>>>>>> This > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is to make CloudHttp2SolrClient to work with the new > > > >> Jdk > > > >>>>>> client. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 3:37 PM Anshum Gupta < > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *NOTICE:* > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Branch branch_10_0 has been cut and versions updated > > > >> to > > > >>>>> 10.1 > > > >>>>>> on > > > >>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> stable > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please observe the normal rules of "No new features > > > >> may > > > >>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>> committed > > > >>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch without checking in with the RM". > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> As this is a major release, we'll be spending more > > > >> time > > > >>>>>>>> stabilizing > > > >>>>>>>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> than minor releases. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum Gupta > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > >> [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > > > >>> [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>> Anshum Gupta > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> Anshum Gupta > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > -- Anshum Gupta
