SOLR-18006 is fixed by me and David and merged. The issue was was how Solr was 
holding Lucene in certain situations :-) Thanks Claude for drafting a fix.

Jan

> 2. des. 2025 kl. 18:33 skrev Anshum Gupta <[email protected]>:
> 
> Thanks Houston.
> 
> @Ishan - I'm waiting for the vector naming changes to be merged. I don't
> want to rush so let me know once this is done.
> 
> @Jan - I think it makes sense to fix this. I just read the description and
> it seems like what you suggest w.r.t a Lucene change causing this behavior.
> Do you intend on taking a look at this today/tomorrow?
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 9:24 AM Houston Putman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> My error response info change is in.
>> 
>> - Houston
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 7:38 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> SOLR-18006 has a work-around and was an issue starting in 9.9.  IMO not
>>> blocker-worthy if I was the RM.
>>> 
>>> I finished porting the SolrJ changes I *really* wanted to do for 10.
>> Jetty
>>> stuff is at least in a package with suitable naming, albeit not yet a
>>> subproject/module.  A bunch of classes were moved as well.  While there's
>>> no general HttpSolrClient yet either, it can be added.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 9:57 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I added https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18006 as a blocker
>>> for
>>>> 10.0. It was reported yesterday and I easily reproduced it in 5 mins.
>>> Have
>>>> not dived deeper... Probably some recent lucene changes that have
>> caused
>>>> this?
>>>> 
>>>> Jan
>>>> 
>>>>> 1. des. 2025 kl. 05:53 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Anshum
>>>>> I'm planning to get SOLR-17927 in by today. Can you please wait for
>>> that
>>>>> one? Apologies for the delay.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ishan
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, 28 Nov, 2025, 11:30 pm Matthew Biscocho (BLOOMBERG/ 120
>> PARK),
>>> <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks Houston for looking at that. I created
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18004 to address this
>> and
>>>>>> spoke with David offline about this. That part of the UI is
>> partially
>>>>>> broken, specifically disk usage, request rates (not calculated in
>> solr
>>>>>> anymore) and collection stats such as num docs and sizes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Other parts of the UI (nodes, CPU, heap, collection and replicas)
>>> should
>>>>>> be fine since that collects from a different endpoint that isn't
>>>> metrics.
>>>>>> There is also another problem with solr doing an aggregation for the
>>>>>> metrics which is no longer possible (see my comment on the jira for
>>> more
>>>>>> insight) and blocked because of CORS in the UI. If we want to get
>> the
>>> RC
>>>>>> early next week, maybe we can hide just those metrics for now and
>> fix
>>>> it in
>>>>>> maybe a 10.1. If we want it fix before then, need to look into
>> getting
>>>>>> around CORS with some jetty configuration.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: [email protected] At: 11/26/25 18:37:01 UTC-5:00To:
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hey Anshum, this is a somewhat big change but is mostly just
>>>> refactoring a
>>>>>> class. I'd love to get it in for 10.0 though, since its a huge
>>> usability
>>>>>> improvement for debugging remote errors.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1657
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As an aside, I'm pretty sure the Admin > Cloud > Nodes screen is
>>> broken
>>>> in
>>>>>> 10.0 currently because it uses the JSON metrics format, which is no
>>>> longer
>>>>>> available... We probably want to delay until that is fixed.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Houston
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 10:28 PM Anshum Gupta <
>> [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Go for it, David. I’ll try and get to it this week but want things
>> to
>>>> be
>>>>>>> stable this week at the very least. I intend to build the RC early
>>> next
>>>>>>> week if not by the end of this week.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 05:42 David Smiley <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Anshum, when do you expect to build the RC?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> BTW I have a number of PRs open in relation to solrj-jetty module
>> or
>>>>>>>> SolrClient rename / disentanglement; basically all PRs created by
>> me
>>>> in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> past ~2 weeks.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/solr/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20is%3Apr%20author%3Adsmiley
>>>>>>>> most need a code review but I'm tempted to just get merging...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 2:32 PM Anshum Gupta <
>> [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Go for it and thanks for letting me know, Eric.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 4:58 AM David Eric Pugh
>>>>>> <[email protected]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, I'd like to get in
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15442 /
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3814 which is renaming the
>>>>>>> various
>>>>>>>>>> Jetty related hosts and port names.
>>>>>>>>>> We missed it for the Solr 8 to 9 jump, and having it just on
>> main
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>> make backporting a pain.
>>>>>>>>>> I need to manually test the install script and then it could be
>>>>>>> merged,
>>>>>>>>>> maybe tomorrow, Nov 5th.
>>>>>>>>>>   On Thursday, October 23, 2025 at 04:52:49 PM EDT, Anshum
>> Gupta
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I did think about that, but finally opted to follow the release
>>>>>>>> wizard.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:03 AM David Smiley <
>> [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Ugh; I'm realizing now that we have a branch_10_0.  I haven't
>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>> backporting intended changes to there from branch_10x.  I'll
>> get
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> them ~now.  I thought that for a major release, branch_10x is
>> in
>>>>>>>> effect
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> release branch.  Until 10 is actually released, why would we
>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> main, branch_10x, and *not* branch_10_0?  The answer is stuff
>>>>>> going
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> 10.1
>>>>>>>>>>> but really can't we just defer back-porting such changes?  Then
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> RM
>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>> just merge branch_10x into branch_10_0 instead of us all do yet
>>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>>>> cherry pick for every change.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 3:21 PM Alessandro Benedetti <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Anshum. A quick update after your confirmation:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927 (renaming)
>>>>>> ->
>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>> ready by tomorrow
>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new type
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> knn
>>>>>>>>>>>> query) *->
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ported to 10.0*
>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new type
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> filter
>>>>>>>>>>>> parameters for knn query) *-> Ported to 10.0*
>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big
>>>>>> Learning
>>>>>>>> To
>>>>>>>>>> Rank
>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement) *-> Ported to 10.0*
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alessandro Benedetti*
>>>>>>>>>>>> Director @ Sease Ltd.
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Solr Chair of PMC*
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
>>>>>>>>>>>> Consulting | Training | Open Source
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> |
>>>>>>>> Github
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 at 17:41, Anshum Gupta <
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Alessandro,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks good. Thanks for the contributions :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 2:42 AM Alessandro Benedetti <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Anshum,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we are finalizing some cool features related to vector
>>>>>> search
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> machine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learning (learning to Rank),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should merge them in the next couple of days max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17927
>>>>>>> (renaming)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17813 (new
>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> knn
>>>>>>>>>>>>> query)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17815 (new
>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> filter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameters for knn query)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16667 (big
>>>>>>>> Learning
>>>>>>>>>> To
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would love to see them in 10.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We'll port them to 10.x, let us know if we can port them to
>>>>>>>> 10.0
>>>>>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alessandro Benedetti*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Director @ Sease Ltd.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Solr Chair of PMC*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Consulting | Training | Open Source
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> |
>>>>>> Twitter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ>
>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>> Github
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 at 19:45, Anshum Gupta <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, James. Thanks for checking with me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 9:14 AM James Dyer <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am about to include SOLR-17771 (#3774) in the new
>>>>>> 10.0
>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is to make CloudHttp2SolrClient to work with the new
>>>>>> Jdk
>>>>>>>>>> client.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 3:37 PM Anshum Gupta <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NOTICE:*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Branch branch_10_0 has been cut and versions updated
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> 10.1
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please observe the normal rules of "No new features
>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch without checking in with the RM".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As this is a major release, we'll be spending more
>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>> stabilizing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than minor releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum Gupta
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Anshum Gupta


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to