Yury, I've been reading your messages and it is great that "you get it", but pppplease!!!!!
We are NOT talking about UX/Agile methods here that many in the valley are moving towards and please don't put out overly dramatic generalizations or sub-positions that have no basis in reality. MOST design works in the Valley are still heavily invested in standard UX methods if they have ANY design at all. There are few name-orgs that are using RED as their sole or even primary mode of operating from what I've seen. Further, it is just really unclear what RED is beyond experienced designers using their experience to short-cut the rest of the system. A valid practice, but really far from a method that one can profess as profound. So I stand by my "niche" sentiment since there are so few people who can even call themselves experienced enough for such a method. With over 15 years of IxD work under my belt, i would only do "genius" design when I had to, but would still always choose a truer UCD process that employed context-based research over using 2ndary sources and my gut. And further as a designer, i find it hard to not have a strong ideation and strategy setting part of the framework and methods that I use regardless of ability to do research. -- dave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=37626 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
