quote:
Corporations who wish to have anonymous accounts should NOT use e-gold for
this purpose. Most people, and corporations, who intend to acquire large
amounts of e-gold would first read the user agreement. Why didn't Costa
Gold?
end quote***************
I would like to submit that the "User Agreement" is a masterful piece of
deception. It's like a "gotcha". A net for fish.
YOUR CAT can have an accout with egold.com. YOUR CAT can have FUNDS in
"its" account .. YOUR CAT needs a notarized proof of identity tho', to get
it out, if DDU comes down on "it".
Since egold.com is so identity oriented (only on LARGE account balances)
WHY don't they just REQUIRE it right up front ? Why wait until they can
hold someones account RANSOM ? Would they "inherit" the account funds if
the REAL owner did NOT show up ?
Would there be some kind of "default" measure already in place ?
Would this policy be just one of many already in the works to KNOW who
everyone is and WHERE everyone is and WHAT everyone does and collect the
"dues" ? If SO then this is NOT private enterprise, it is a government
agency.
LaMarr M. Dell Sr.
Please, do NOT cover up the camera lens.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
