Harry D. Corsover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Helder, > >Did you really go back and read Evie's posts?
I thought I did. >While I don't work the way >she does, and prefer to use the Auto File Log myself, this is not how she >works, and apparently not the way she wants to work. It has nothing to do >with mail actions, since she apparently wants to be able to visually scan >messages in real time _as they come in_ using the Connection Status >window. Her point was that her life would be easier if the list behaved the way she wanted it to behave. My point was the she would get faster and more reliable results if she made better use of the tools she already has (mail actions). >To put it another way: > >Evie is saying "can you help me do 'A' by putting an identifier in the >Emailer list subject headings?" and lots of people are saying "Do 'B' >instead." Is 'B' viable? I certainly think so, but it is Evie's choice >about whether to do this. From my point of view: Evie is saying "can you help me do 'A' by putting an identifier in the Emailer list subject headings?" and lots of people are saying "There are better ways to do 'A'." Is Evie able to reply quickly to urgent messages by watching the Connection Status window? Apparently so, but it's not the best way to track urgent messages. ___________________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe send a mail message with a SUBJECT line of "unsubscribe" to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
