On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 05:04 PM, Steve Blackmore wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 19:18:13 +0200, you wrote:
> 
> >I tried your value, and it seem you are really close to the max 
> >frequency drive for the stepper.
> 
> Claude - if that were so it would not work with identical settings under
> Mach3. Same step frequency, same drivers same PC same everything.

It might be close to the limits of the EMC step pulse generator (which 
aren't neccessarily the same as those of the Mach step pulse generator).
Personally I think that is unlikely, but the test is relatively straightforward.
You could reduce by just a factor of two instead of ten, the key is to
drop it by a significant factor on both systems and see if the difference
is still there.  If the misbehavior is still there, that pretty much rules out
step generator limits.

-- 
  John Kasunich
  jmkasun...@fastmail.fm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to