It would appear that on Apr 16 & 17, David Seikel did say: > I was a long time konsole user, but switched to eterm. I gave up on > eterm though, mostly coz it just plain don't play well with mc, > which is a critical app for me. Roxtem does work well for me now.
> Roxterm just works as far as my mc usage is concerned, there was no need > to mess with it. I've been holding on to Konsole for a long time now. Thanks to this thread I became aware of the existence of Roxterm. So I just installed it to one of my linux... For me mc is also a critical app. And for the most part Roxterm seems willing to play nice with mc. And it looks like I'd only need a little bit of profile, and color schema work (And a few slight changes to the assorted shellscripts I have that currently call konsole) for me to switch to using Roxterm instead. But I'm very keyboard centric and I dislike needing to use the mouse to get at the menu. So I need to either leave the "menu shortcuts keys" or the "menu access key" enabled. Both of which conflict with mc's key-bindings. In mc I use Alt+P from the panel view to pull up previous commands. But if roxterm's "menu shortcuts keys" are enabled I get the preferences menu. And if instead, I enable the "menu access key" then the F10 (default) keybinding gets in the way of closing mc. (yeah I know I can use the two stroke "esc" "0" instead, but my reflexes expect F10 to work... The problem is that Roxterm evidently doesn't include a shortcut editor, but instead relies on some gnome desktop based method. that as far as I can see doesn't work with E17, E16, or XFCE. Do you know of any way to assign a non-default menu access key that doesn't depend on my installing the whole gnome bag of tricks first??? -- | ~^~ ~^~ | <?> <?> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook | ^ J(tWdy)P | \___/ <<jtw...@ttlc.net>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
