sure.... give me five years to try to understand Faster than Light.... OK? On Monday, May 13, 2013 11:43:41 AM UTC-4, sadovnik socratus wrote: > > More details > ===. > > The basis of SRT ( by an uneducated Socratus) > > ===. > > SRT is based on four facts. > > > > Fact number 1: > > The constant speed of photon in vacuum is minimal. > > ( from vacuum's point of view and tachyon theory ) > > > > Fact number 2: > > The inertia of photon depends on its potential energy: E=Mc^2 > > In 1905 Einstein asked: > > “ Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content ?” > > As he realized the answer was: > > “ Yes, it depends on E= Mc^2 ” > > It means that inertia of quantum particle (photon, electron ) > > depends on E= Mc^2 ( nobody explains the details of such > > possibility of inertia movement. How can E=Mc^2 > > be responsible for inertial movement of quantum particle ? ) > > Someone wrote to me: > > “An old professor of mine used to say > > that anyone who can answer that question > > what inertia is, would win a Nobel Prize. “ > > > > > > Fact number 3: > > Every speed and energy > > ( including the speed and energy of photon ) are relative. > > Speed, energy, impulse . . . . etc they are physical parameters > > which belong to one, single quantum particle. > > If you change one parameter all others will change automatically too. > > For example : > > In 1916 Sommerfeld found the formula of electron : e^2=ah*c. > > If you change one electron's parameter all others parameters > > also will be changed and the electron's energy will change too. > > Take, for example, electron in atom. > > Electron tied with atom by the energy: E=-me^4/2h*^2= -13,6eV. > > But if someone parameter changes, then electron jumps out from atom > > with energy E=h*f ( it is said: electron emits quantum of light, > > but where this quantum of light is hidden in the electron, in which pocket > ?) > > In vacuum the energy of electron is E=Mc^2 (according to SRT and Dirac), > > but when someone parameter is changed then electron jumps out from > > vacuum with energy E=h*f. ( effect of vacuum fluctuation ). > > > > Fact number 4: > > The Lorentz equations explain the transformations (revolving movement) > > of quantum particles using the Goudsmit – Uhlenbeck inner impulse > > of particle: h* = h/ 2pi. > > ===. > > All the best. > > Israel Sadovnik Socratus > > =====… > > P.S. > > " Einstein's special theory of relativity is based on two postulates: > > One is the relativity of motion, and the second is the constancy > > and universality of the speed of light. > > Could the first postulate be true and the other false? > > If that was not possible, Einstein would not have had to make two > > postulates. But I don't think many people realized until recently > > that you could have a consistent theory in which you changed only > > the second postulate." > > / Lee Smolin, The Trouble With Physics, p. 226. / > > # > > Question: > > Can quantum of light change its constant speed ? > > Answer: Faster-than-light. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light > > etc . . . > > ===… > > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:05 PM, nominal9 <nomi...@yahoo.com <javascript:> > > wrote: > >> So... Socratus and Awori..... I guess I should ask the question >> differently.... do photons have "mass"? >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon >> Experimental checks on photon mass >> >> The photon is currently understood to be strictly massless, but this is >> an experimental question. If the photon is not a strictly massless >> particle, it would not move at the exact speed of light in vacuum, *c*. >> Its speed would be lower and depend on its frequency. Relativity would be >> unaffected by this; the so-called speed of light, *c*, would then not be >> the actual speed at which light moves, but a constant of nature which is >> the maximum speed that any object could theoretically attain in space-time. >> [21] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#cite_note-23> Thus, it would >> still be the speed of space-time ripples (gravitational >> waves<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_waves>and >> gravitons <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton>), but it would not be >> the speed of photons. >> >> A massive photon would have other effects as well. Coulomb's >> law<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_law>would be modified and the >> electromagnetic field would have an extra >> physical degree of freedom. These effects yield more sensitive experimental >> probes of the photon mass than the frequency dependence of the speed of >> light. If Coulomb's law is not exactly valid, then that would cause the >> presence of an electric >> field<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_field>inside a hollow conductor >> when it is subjected to an external electric >> field. This thus allows one to >> test<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_electromagnetism>Coulomb's law >> to very high precision. >> [22] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#cite_note-24> A null result >> of such an experiment has set a limit of *m* ≲ 10−14 >> eV/c2.[23]<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#cite_note-25> >> >> Sharper upper limits have been obtained in experiments designed to detect >> effects caused by the galactic vector >> potential<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_potential>. >> Although the galactic vector potential is very large because the galactic >> magnetic >> field <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field> exists on very long >> length scales, only the magnetic field is observable if the photon is >> massless. In case of a massive photon, the mass term [image: >> \scriptstyle\frac{1}{2} m^2 A_{\mu}A^{\mu}] would affect the galactic >> plasma. The fact that no such effects are seen implies an upper bound on >> the photon mass of *m* < 3×10−27 >> eV/c2.[24]<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#cite_note-26>The galactic >> vector potential can also be probed directly by measuring the >> torque exerted on a magnetized >> ring.[25]<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#cite_note-27>Such methods >> were used to obtain the sharper upper limit of 10 >> −18eV/c2 (the equivalent of 1.07×10−27 atomic mass units) given by the >> Particle Data >> Group.[26]<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#cite_note-amsler-28> >> >> These sharp limits from the non-observation of the effects caused by the >> galactic vector potential have been shown to be model >> dependent.[27]<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#cite_note-29>If the >> photon mass is generated via the Higgs >> mechanism <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism> then the upper >> limit of *m*≲10−14 eV/c2 from the test of Coulomb's law is valid. >> >> Photons inside >> superconductors<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductors>do develop a >> nonzero effective >> rest >> mass<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_mass_%28solid-state_physics%29>; >> >> as a result, electromagnetic forces become short-range inside >> superconductors.[28] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#cite_note-30> >> See also: Supernova/Acceleration >> Probe<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova/Acceleration_Probe> >> >> >> On Saturday, May 11, 2013 1:31:48 PM UTC-4, sadovnik socratus wrote: >>> >>> photon is an energy/mass particle: E=Mc^2 >>> >>> this energy/mass ( E=Mc^2 ) is not constant parameter >>> >>> this energy/mass ( E=Mc^2 ) can be changed ( together with speed ) >>> >>> for example: E=Mc^2 changes into E=h*f and vice versa >>> == >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 4:53 PM, nominal9 <nomi...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Photon<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon> >>>> Do you agree with this? >>>> so, is a photon energy or particle..... when, if both?...... >>>> >>>> >>>> On Saturday, May 11, 2013 7:03:26 AM UTC-4, sadovnik socratus wrote: >>>>> >>>>> SRT by an uneducated Socratus. >>>>> =. >>>>> SRT is based on three facts ! >>>>> Fact number 1: >>>>> The constant speed of photon in vacuum is minimal. >>>>> Fact number 2: >>>>> The inertia of photon depends on its potential energy: E=Mc^2 >>>>> Fact number 3: >>>>> Every speed and energy >>>>> ( including the speed and energy of photon ) are relative. >>>>> ===. >>>>> Israel Socratus >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Epistemology" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to epistemology...@**googlegroups.com. >>>> To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com. >>>> Visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/**group/epistemology?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en> >>>> . >>>> For more options, visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out> >>>> . >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You do not really understand something unless you can explain >>> it to your grandmother. / Albert Einstein / >>> The secret of God and Existence is hidden in ‘Quantum of Light Theory ’. >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Epistemology" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to epistemology...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> >> . >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> > > > > -- > You do not really understand something unless you can explain > it to your grandmother. / Albert Einstein / > The secret of God and Existence is hidden in ‘Quantum of Light Theory ’. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
