> On 9 Sep 2020, at 12:45, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 10:35 PM Bruce Kellett <bhkellet...@gmail.com > <mailto:bhkellet...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > >Not on the closest continuer theory. If there is a tie, there is no unique > >closest continuer. If there is only one continuer, he is necessarily the > >closest. > > Closest continuer theory Is a remarkably silly theory even for philosophers, > and that's saying something!
It is indeed inconsistent with Indexical Digital Mechanism (YD + CT, if you remember). We can’t believe in both Darwin, and the closest continuer theory. But it might be consistent with non-mechanism, to be sure. Bruno > > John K Clark > > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2GeEeJ3YyxZDRYs-4Y_%2BU1HHVnhO8Nty4JmzULyDr5UQ%40mail.gmail.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2GeEeJ3YyxZDRYs-4Y_%2BU1HHVnhO8Nty4JmzULyDr5UQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3D20E35B-CA46-4EAA-BE2F-3AB439E3BCDD%40ulb.ac.be.
