--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > I'm a hit and run reader and poster on FFL. I don't have > > time to read all the posts in most threads, so I often > > form impressions based on partial information. I was > > talking with a friend last night who used to post > > regularly but who these days only lurks. He said that it > > was unfair to lump Judy and Raunchy together with regard > > to their criticisms of Obama. He opined that Judy had > > been much more fair and objective. So I'm sorry I did > > that Judy. Maybe I'll end up apologizing to Raunchy too, > > but I still get the impression that she couldn't bring > > herself to say anything positive about Obama, due to her > > emotional commitment to Hillary. > > Thank you, Rick. > > It occurred to me last night as I was reading Raunchy's > post #219365 that the emotional component is not so > much a matter of Hillary having lost as of *how* she > lost, how incredibly unfairly and viciously she was > treated by Obama's supporters--in the lefty blogs, by > the Democratic Party, by the media, and of course by > the right wingers, not to mention some of the people > on FFL. And it wasn't just Hillary who was treated > this way, it was her supporters as well. > > That left deep emotional scars (speaking of Barry's > Cockburn quotes about "tending to cause damage"). > > Obama himself wasn't the instigator of most of it, > but he did almost nothing to try to stop or mitigate > it and even encouraged it at times. That's awfully > hard to forgive.
Not for sane people. It's OVER. Why aren't YOU over it? Hillary certainly is.
