--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunsh...@...> wrote: > > Yep. I'm sure there's a certain art to writing like that, > which I obviously don't have. But most of what I see > has been either websites > (and I wonder how many actually look at them), homilies > to, I guess, make your day a little brighter, or basically > trivial stuff like in the cartoon. I don't see hardly anything > interesting and no connecting at all. Does the internet > really need one more way to make noise?
In the hands of a good writer, or someone who actually has something to say, Twitter would be very interesting. Oscar Wilde would have been the GOD of Twitter. Interestingly, in a way I've consigned a few people here to "Twitter Hell" already. I never read *anything* they write other than the first sentence or so that appears in Message View. And that's more than enough to remind me why they're in the Instant Next Key category. What's fascinating is to see -- even from the Message View "tweets" -- how freaked out some of them have gotten about having been dumped. "Hell hath no fury like a blowhard ignored." :-)
