--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> wrote: > > > > Yep. I'm sure there's a certain art to writing like that, > > which I obviously don't have. But most of what I see > > has been either websites > > (and I wonder how many actually look at them), homilies > > to, I guess, make your day a little brighter, or basically > > trivial stuff like in the cartoon. I don't see hardly anything > > interesting and no connecting at all. Does the internet > > really need one more way to make noise? > > In the hands of a good writer, or someone who > actually has something to say, Twitter would > be very interesting. Oscar Wilde would have > been the GOD of Twitter. > > Interestingly, in a way I've consigned a few > people here to "Twitter Hell" already. I never > read *anything* they write other than the first > sentence or so that appears in Message View. > And that's more than enough to remind me why > they're in the Instant Next Key category. > > What's fascinating is to see -- even from the > Message View "tweets" -- how freaked out some > of them have gotten about having been dumped. > "Hell hath no fury like a blowhard ignored." :-) >
Indeed. It was predicted and it's fun to watch.
