--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blusc0ut <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blusc0ut <no_reply@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > Chakras, Soul, are not mentioned in the argumentation of > > > Lawson and Judy. If you mention them, they ignore it as > > > if you have never said anything. > > > > Excuse me??? > > You may have asked me about my experiences, but mainly > when I complained that you belittled, at the time, my > Sahasrara as 'bit of esoterica'.
I wasn't "belittling" it. Not sure why you took it that way, but it wasn't what I intended. > It is not that you need to acknowledge my experiences, > but in your whole evaluation of transcendence, it plays > nor role. That I'm aware of, at any rate. But that's why I've asked you to expand a bit, if possible. > You just refer only to rather simplistic criterion, of > silence vs activity, not acknowledging there could be > other dimensions, namely the chakras as energy centers > or dimensions. I've never suggested there couldn't be other dimensions. I'm sure there *are* other dimensions. Look, my beef is with your claim that I "ignore it as if you never said anything." That is simply not true, and I'd like you to acknowledge that you miswrote, because it's pretty insulting. As I said, I'm not qualified to discuss chakras, and if that means it's impossible for you to continue the discussion, fine. But you keep talking about TM, including about my and others' TM experiences, and that's what's kept the discussion going, because I *am* qualified to discuss TM, at least from the perspective of a rank-and-filer. <snip>
