--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Gee, you're stupid, laughinggull.
> > > 
> > > Feste too. But you're *really* stupid.
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > Feste, we both got off easy in the above from our dear Judy;
> > IMO, I got off just a bit easier. I received a mere harsh
> > glance whereas you received a slap on the wrist. However, we
> > both avoided a good ol' fashioned ass-whoopin'. You see, she
> > only called me "stupid" (less favorable) but spelled it
> > correctly (more favorable); same for you, however, she added
> > the adverb "really" (less favorable), again spelled correctly
> > (more favorable), then used asterisks for emphasis (less
> > favorable).
> 
> Er, laughinggull, I'm not sure why you thought the "you"
> in "you're" above referred to feste rather than you. It
> did not.
> 

Yes, as feste pointed out also. And as I pointed out to feste, I was going by 
what was on each line separated by a blank space.

> > This got me to thinking (!) and, being a slow day at work 
> > yesterday, I found myself becoming more proficient in the
> > use of the "advanced search" function on FFL. Below are
> > some of my findings:
> 
> Also not clear, especially when you went to such trouble to
> compile links to examples, why you believe they're all a
> function of my having asked someone (usually Barry) a 
> question. I'll take a wild guess: You didn't actually read
> the examples you cited.
> 
> In any case, while links by themselves can look impressive,
> it's even more impressive to check the posts themselves.
> Because if you do, you will find that I do not use the
> adjective "STOOOOOOOOOPID" lightly.
> 
> (By "you" in the paragraph immediately above, I don't mean laughinggull; I 
> mean those readers who are not themselves
> STOOOOOOOOOOOOPID.)

Uh oh...looks like I won't be able to finish that nap after all. No ma'am, I 
wasn't sleeping, just resting my head. Yes ma'am, I was paying attention. Would 
you please repeat the question?

> > Few have tried but none can match the skill and artistry of our dear Judy 
> > in calling someone stupid on this forum...to put it simply, she *is* and 
> > will *always be* the one true master.
> > 
> > When Judy wants you to pay attention (like a fifth-grade student with his 
> > head on his desk abrupty awakened from a stolen nap, and lifting his head 
> > in confusion thinking "Did Miss Stein just ask me something?"), she 
> > mispells "stupid" as "stoopid". The number of "o"s used varies from as few 
> > as two up to a whopping eighteen and is dependent on how much attention she 
> > wishes to garner from you:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/272412
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/253194
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/225008
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/279466
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/276580
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/328630
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/261112.
> > 
> > My research also indicates that our dear Judy is the only poster on FFL to 
> > have attempted using "stoopider" or "stoopidest", again with varying number 
> > of "o"s, as in:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/247574
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/177467.
> > I humbly bow to the master.
> > 
> > By the time she starts attaching "really", again misspelled as "reely" with 
> > varying number of "e"s, to her "stoopid", it becomes suddenly and 
> > abundantly clear to that fifth-grade student who has just awakened from his 
> > stolen nap that, yes indeedy, Miss Stein has definitely asked him a 
> > question, and not only that, fully expects him to answer or else face the 
> > consequences:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/163836
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/251793
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/270344
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/272653.
> > 
> > That fifth-grade begins furtively glancing around looking for an escape 
> > route when Miss Stein begins adding extra "l"s (this doesn't happen often 
> > as I think it might be reserved for very special cases) in the misspelling 
> > of "reeellly", and/or using several repetitions of "reely", again with 
> > varying number of "e"s (happens frequently):
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/291538
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/291102
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/193884
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/292164
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/247573
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/323593
> > and how can I not draw attention to what will now become infamous:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/247573.
> > Everyone, *on your knees*.
> > 
> > Hearsay from past students tells the tale of Miss Stein once going so far 
> > as to use asterisks to add emphasis to her misspelling of several 
> > repetitions of "reeellly" with both a large number of extra "e"s *and* 
> > "l"s, henceforth referred to as the "perfect storm" in literary circles, 
> > and the two students to whom this brutality was directed were heard 
> > muttering, "Oh, the inhumanity, the inhumanity!" and "Dear God, help me 
> > Jesus, dear God, help me Jesus!". Well, dear readers, legend becomes fact 
> > as I present to you the following from my research:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/194019.
> > Man, my ass is stinging from just reading that. We know that Barry survived 
> > but does anyone know how do.rflex is doing?
> > 
> > Yep, feste, I'd say we both got off reeelll easy with Miss Stein. Now we 
> > can go back to sleep and finish that stolen nap. Sweet dreams...

Reply via email to