There is a perfection to what you are oblivious to in all your posts, lg. Your problem is this: You have lost the capacity to sense what you just might be anaesthetized to in your apprehension of what is going on.
It's starts with your conception and experience of yourself: your self is way too known to yourself to have been created by something other than yourself. You have a metaphysical complacency--unconscious as this is--which always deprives you of any kind of real terror or beauty in the form of a self-discovery. Look at the reflexive way you are processing this very post of mine: there you have exactly what I am trying to tell you: You subvert any chance of being in the unknown, and therefore your responses are always tediously predictable to your soul--which is finding you a bore. The malady of the quotidian laughinggull. I knew you would enjoy this. And remember: the first order of response is to defend yourself, find a rejoinder, mount some counterattack. Never to let something get into you which will or might alter your experience of yourself and reality. Don't mind me, laughinggull: I compensate for my congenital mediocrity by trying to be much more interesting and provocative than I have a right to be. My life is just very dull. Forgive me. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > One additional response inserted below: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Gee, you're stupid, laughinggull. > > > > > > > > Feste too. But you're *really* stupid. > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > Feste, we both got off easy in the above from our dear Judy; > > > IMO, I got off just a bit easier. I received a mere harsh > > > glance whereas you received a slap on the wrist. However, we > > > both avoided a good ol' fashioned ass-whoopin'. You see, she > > > only called me "stupid" (less favorable) but spelled it > > > correctly (more favorable); same for you, however, she added > > > the adverb "really" (less favorable), again spelled correctly > > > (more favorable), then used asterisks for emphasis (less > > > favorable). > > > > Er, laughinggull, I'm not sure why you thought the "you" > > in "you're" above referred to feste rather than you. It > > did not. > > > > > This got me to thinking (!) and, being a slow day at work > > > yesterday, I found myself becoming more proficient in the > > > use of the "advanced search" function on FFL. Below are > > > some of my findings: > > > > Also not clear, especially when you went to such trouble to > > compile links to examples, why you believe they're all a > > function of my having asked someone (usually Barry) a > > question. I'll take a wild guess: You didn't actually read > > the examples you cited. > > > > In any case, while links by themselves can look impressive, > > it's even more impressive to check the posts themselves. > > Because if you do, you will find that I do not use the > > adjective "STOOOOOOOOOPID" lightly. > > That last sentence defines exactly our differences in how each of us > approaches this forum. You really *do* take it seriously, don't you? *Not* > using adjectives lightly...would that be heavily or harshly? Lighten up Judy! > > > > > (By "you" in the paragraph immediately above, I don't mean laughinggull; I > > mean those readers who are not themselves > > STOOOOOOOOOOOOPID.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Few have tried but none can match the skill and artistry of our dear Judy > > > in calling someone stupid on this forum...to put it simply, she *is* and > > > will *always be* the one true master. > > > > > > When Judy wants you to pay attention (like a fifth-grade student with his > > > head on his desk abrupty awakened from a stolen nap, and lifting his head > > > in confusion thinking "Did Miss Stein just ask me something?"), she > > > mispells "stupid" as "stoopid". The number of "o"s used varies from as > > > few as two up to a whopping eighteen and is dependent on how much > > > attention she wishes to garner from you: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/272412 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/253194 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/225008 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/279466 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/276580 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/328630 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/261112. > > > > > > My research also indicates that our dear Judy is the only poster on FFL > > > to have attempted using "stoopider" or "stoopidest", again with varying > > > number of "o"s, as in: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/247574 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/177467. > > > I humbly bow to the master. > > > > > > By the time she starts attaching "really", again misspelled as "reely" > > > with varying number of "e"s, to her "stoopid", it becomes suddenly and > > > abundantly clear to that fifth-grade student who has just awakened from > > > his stolen nap that, yes indeedy, Miss Stein has definitely asked him a > > > question, and not only that, fully expects him to answer or else face the > > > consequences: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/163836 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/251793 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/270344 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/272653. > > > > > > That fifth-grade begins furtively glancing around looking for an escape > > > route when Miss Stein begins adding extra "l"s (this doesn't happen often > > > as I think it might be reserved for very special cases) in the > > > misspelling of "reeellly", and/or using several repetitions of "reely", > > > again with varying number of "e"s (happens frequently): > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/291538 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/291102 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/193884 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/292164 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/247573 > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/323593 > > > and how can I not draw attention to what will now become infamous: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/247573. > > > Everyone, *on your knees*. > > > > > > Hearsay from past students tells the tale of Miss Stein once going so far > > > as to use asterisks to add emphasis to her misspelling of several > > > repetitions of "reeellly" with both a large number of extra "e"s *and* > > > "l"s, henceforth referred to as the "perfect storm" in literary circles, > > > and the two students to whom this brutality was directed were heard > > > muttering, "Oh, the inhumanity, the inhumanity!" and "Dear God, help me > > > Jesus, dear God, help me Jesus!". Well, dear readers, legend becomes fact > > > as I present to you the following from my research: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/194019. > > > Man, my ass is stinging from just reading that. We know that Barry > > > survived but does anyone know how do.rflex is doing? > > > > > > Yep, feste, I'd say we both got off reeelll easy with Miss Stein. Now we > > > can go back to sleep and finish that stolen nap. Sweet dreams... > > > > > >
