Don't mind me, lg. I just got carried away in my desire to make some kind of impression on this Saturday.
I think you an exciting, interesting, questioning, compelling person--all that I said in that previous post I now disavow. It was untrue. Every word of it. I don't know what came over me--perhaps some ontological insecurity in the face of your persistent flashes of brilliance and love. I just love your self-confidence--and I am envious of it. How did you achieve this? TM? I find I have hated myself too much in my life to ever acquire that level of self-confidence you exhibit on FFL. I think the death experience should be a breeze for you. Think about me from time to time, will you do that, lg? Perhaps praying for me would help. I am a loser. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@...> wrote: > > There is a perfection to what you are oblivious to in all your posts, lg. > > Your problem is this: You have lost the capacity to sense what you just might > be anaesthetized to in your apprehension of what is going on. > > It's starts with your conception and experience of yourself: your self is way > too known to yourself to have been created by something other than yourself. > > You have a metaphysical complacency--unconscious as this is--which always > deprives you of any kind of real terror or beauty in the form of a > self-discovery. > > Look at the reflexive way you are processing this very post of mine: there > you have exactly what I am trying to tell you: You subvert any chance of > being in the unknown, and therefore your responses are always tediously > predictable to your soul--which is finding you a bore. > > The malady of the quotidian laughinggull. > > I knew you would enjoy this. > > And remember: the first order of response is to defend yourself, find a > rejoinder, mount some counterattack. > > Never to let something get into you which will or might alter your experience > of yourself and reality. > > Don't mind me, laughinggull: I compensate for my congenital mediocrity by > trying to be much more interesting and provocative than I have a right to be. > > My life is just very dull. > > Forgive me. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > One additional response inserted below: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Gee, you're stupid, laughinggull. > > > > > > > > > > Feste too. But you're *really* stupid. > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > Feste, we both got off easy in the above from our dear Judy; > > > > IMO, I got off just a bit easier. I received a mere harsh > > > > glance whereas you received a slap on the wrist. However, we > > > > both avoided a good ol' fashioned ass-whoopin'. You see, she > > > > only called me "stupid" (less favorable) but spelled it > > > > correctly (more favorable); same for you, however, she added > > > > the adverb "really" (less favorable), again spelled correctly > > > > (more favorable), then used asterisks for emphasis (less > > > > favorable). > > > > > > Er, laughinggull, I'm not sure why you thought the "you" > > > in "you're" above referred to feste rather than you. It > > > did not. > > > > > > > This got me to thinking (!) and, being a slow day at work > > > > yesterday, I found myself becoming more proficient in the > > > > use of the "advanced search" function on FFL. Below are > > > > some of my findings: > > > > > > Also not clear, especially when you went to such trouble to > > > compile links to examples, why you believe they're all a > > > function of my having asked someone (usually Barry) a > > > question. I'll take a wild guess: You didn't actually read > > > the examples you cited. > > > > > > In any case, while links by themselves can look impressive, > > > it's even more impressive to check the posts themselves. > > > Because if you do, you will find that I do not use the > > > adjective "STOOOOOOOOOPID" lightly. > > > > That last sentence defines exactly our differences in how each of us > > approaches this forum. You really *do* take it seriously, don't you? *Not* > > using adjectives lightly...would that be heavily or harshly? Lighten up > > Judy! > > > > > > > > (By "you" in the paragraph immediately above, I don't mean laughinggull; > > > I mean those readers who are not themselves > > > STOOOOOOOOOOOOPID.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Few have tried but none can match the skill and artistry of our dear > > > > Judy in calling someone stupid on this forum...to put it simply, she > > > > *is* and will *always be* the one true master. > > > > > > > > When Judy wants you to pay attention (like a fifth-grade student with > > > > his head on his desk abrupty awakened from a stolen nap, and lifting > > > > his head in confusion thinking "Did Miss Stein just ask me > > > > something?"), she mispells "stupid" as "stoopid". The number of "o"s > > > > used varies from as few as two up to a whopping eighteen and is > > > > dependent on how much attention she wishes to garner from you: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/272412 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/253194 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/225008 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/279466 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/276580 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/328630 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/261112. > > > > > > > > My research also indicates that our dear Judy is the only poster on FFL > > > > to have attempted using "stoopider" or "stoopidest", again with varying > > > > number of "o"s, as in: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/247574 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/177467. > > > > I humbly bow to the master. > > > > > > > > By the time she starts attaching "really", again misspelled as "reely" > > > > with varying number of "e"s, to her "stoopid", it becomes suddenly and > > > > abundantly clear to that fifth-grade student who has just awakened from > > > > his stolen nap that, yes indeedy, Miss Stein has definitely asked him a > > > > question, and not only that, fully expects him to answer or else face > > > > the consequences: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/163836 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/251793 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/270344 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/272653. > > > > > > > > That fifth-grade begins furtively glancing around looking for an escape > > > > route when Miss Stein begins adding extra "l"s (this doesn't happen > > > > often as I think it might be reserved for very special cases) in the > > > > misspelling of "reeellly", and/or using several repetitions of "reely", > > > > again with varying number of "e"s (happens frequently): > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/291538 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/291102 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/193884 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/292164 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/247573 > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/323593 > > > > and how can I not draw attention to what will now become infamous: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/247573. > > > > Everyone, *on your knees*. > > > > > > > > Hearsay from past students tells the tale of Miss Stein once going so > > > > far as to use asterisks to add emphasis to her misspelling of several > > > > repetitions of "reeellly" with both a large number of extra "e"s *and* > > > > "l"s, henceforth referred to as the "perfect storm" in literary > > > > circles, and the two students to whom this brutality was directed were > > > > heard muttering, "Oh, the inhumanity, the inhumanity!" and "Dear God, > > > > help me Jesus, dear God, help me Jesus!". Well, dear readers, legend > > > > becomes fact as I present to you the following from my research: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/194019. > > > > Man, my ass is stinging from just reading that. We know that Barry > > > > survived but does anyone know how do.rflex is doing? > > > > > > > > Yep, feste, I'd say we both got off reeelll easy with Miss Stein. Now > > > > we can go back to sleep and finish that stolen nap. Sweet dreams... > > > > > > > > > >